Comparability of the Asthma Control Test telephone interview administration format with self-administered mail-out mail-back format
- 15 January 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Informa UK Limited in Current Medical Research and Opinion
- Vol. 25 (3), 717-727
- https://doi.org/10.1185/03007990802711602
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the comparability of ACT scores from a telephone interview format (‘Telephone’) against the original paper-and-pencil format (‘Paper’). Methods: This was a randomized, crossover design with subjects completing both paper and telephone interview questionnaires. Subjects were ≥18 years old, with an asthma diagnosis, and receiving treatment within the last year. Eligible subjects were randomized to one of four administration form (AF) groups – (1) Telephone–Telephone, (2) Paper–Paper, (3) Paper–Telephone, (4) Telephone–Paper. Internal consistency and test–retest reliability were compared across groups. Differential item functioning (DIF) tests were conducted at baseline to evaluate AF effects on individual ACT items. Unadjusted and adjusted mean ACT scores were compared between AFs at baseline and unadjusted and adjusted means changes in ACT scores from baseline to follow-up were compared across the four groups. Lastly, the ability of ACT scores to discriminate between self-reported asthma severity was compared between the AFs using ANOVA. Results: A total of 1090 asthma respondents completed paper (n = 579) and telephone interview (n = 511) questionnaires. Internal consistency reliability of ACT scores at baseline was 0.81 and 0.83 for the paper and telephone AFs, respectively. Test–retest reliabilities ranged from 0.87 to 0.91 across the four groups. Responses to ACT items showed no significant DIF between AFs (χ2 = 6.6, p = 0.25). ACT scores differed significantly across asthma severity levels in the hypothesized way for both paper (F = 230.1, p < 0.001) and telephone (F = 173.4, p < 0.001) AFs. Conclusion: ACT scores from a telephone interview are reliable and comparable to ACT scores from a self-administered paper-and-pencil format. A potential limitation concerns the representativeness of study participants of asthmatics in the population.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Global strategy for asthma management and prevention: GINA executive summaryEuropean Respiratory Journal, 2008
- Mode of Administration Is Important in US National Estimates of Health-Related Quality of LifeMedical Care, 2007
- Mode of questionnaire administration can have serious effects on data qualityJournal of Public Health, 2005
- Assessment of asthma control and severityAnnals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, 2004
- The global burden of asthma: executive summary of the GINA Dissemination Committee ReportAllergy, 2004
- Development of the asthma control test☆A survey for assessing asthma controlJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2004
- The health economics of asthma and rhinitis. I. Assessing the economic impactJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2001
- Compliance with US asthma management guidelines and specialty care: a regional variation or national concern?Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 1999
- How Does Home Management of Asthma Exacerbations by Parents of Inner-city Children Differ From NHLBI Guideline Recommendations?Pediatrics, 1999
- Comparisons of the Costs and Quality of Norms for the SF-36 Health Survey Collected by Mail Versus Telephone Interview: Results From a National SurveyMedical Care, 1994