Comparing in vivo kinematics of unicondylar and bi-unicondylar knee replacements
- 20 January 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
- Vol. 13 (7), 551-556
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-004-0565-x
Abstract
Preserving both cruciate ligaments in unicondylar knee arthroplasty likely provides more normal knee mechanics and contributes to enhanced patient function. It follows that preserving both cruciate ligaments with total knee arthroplasty should provide functional benefit compared to arthroplasty sacrificing one or both cruciates. The purpose of this study was to compare knee kinematics in patients with optimally functioning cruciate-preserving medial unicondylar and bi-unicondylar arthroplasty to determine if knee motions differed. Eight consenting patients with seven medial unicondylar and five bi-unicondylar arthroplasties were studied using lateral fluoroscopy during treadmill gait, stair stepping, and maximum flexion activities. Patient-specific geometric models based on CT and CAD data were used for shape matching to determine the three-dimensional knee kinematics. Tibiofemoral contact locations were computed for the replaced compartments. Maximum flexion in kneeling was 135°±14° for unicondylar knees and 123°±14° for bi-unicondylar knees (p=0.22). For 0°–30° flexion during the stair activity, the medial condyle translated posterior 3.5±2.5 mm in unicondylar knees and 4.7±1.9 mm in bi-unicondylar knees (p>0.05). Lateral posterior translation was 5.0±2.3 mm in bi-unicondylar knees for 0°–30° flexion. From heel-strike to mid-stance phase, there was little tibial rotation, but unicondylar knees showed 1.5±1.6 mm posterior translation of the medial condyle, while bi-unicondylar knees showed 5.1±2.2 mm (p<<0.05). The bi-unicondylar knees showed 3.8±3.4 mm posterior lateral condylar translation. Preserving both cruciate ligaments in knee arthroplasty appears to maintain some basic features of normal knee kinematics. Knees with bi-unicondylar arthroplasty showed kinematics closer to motions observed in total knee arthroplasty, slightly less weight-bearing flexion, and greater dynamic laxity in gait than unicondylar knees. Despite kinematic differences, knees with unicondylar and bi-unicondylar arthroplasty can provide excellent functional outcomes in appropriately selected patients.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- 2003 Hap Paul Award paper of the International Society for Technology in Arthroplasty: Design and activity dependence of kinematics in fixed and mobile-bearing knee arthroplastiesThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 2004
- Knee Motions During Maximum Flexion in Fixed and Mobile-Bearing ArthroplastiesClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2003
- Fluoroscopic analysis of the kinematics of deep flexion in total knee arthroplastyThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 2002
- Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplastyThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 2001
- Accurate measurement of three-dimensional knee replacement kinematics using single-plane fluoroscopyIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 1996
- The Anterior Cruciate Ligament in Knee ArthroplastyClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1992
- Unicompartmental Knee ArthroplastyClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1991
- Rationale, of The Knee Society Clinical Rating SystemClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1989
- The envelope of passive knee joint motionJournal of Biomechanics, 1988
- Clinical Results of the Oxford KneeClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1986