Impact of the administration of probiotics on the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials*
Top Cited Papers
- 1 March 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Critical Care Medicine
- Vol. 38 (3), 954-962
- https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0b013e3181c8fe4b
Abstract
Previous reviews showed no benefit for the administration of probiotics in critically ill patients, but they did not focus on ventilator-associated pneumonia. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing probiotics and control in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation and reporting on incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia. PubMed, Scopus, Current Contents, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and reference lists were searched. Weighted mean differences, pooled odds ratios, and 95% confidence intervals were calculated, implementing both the Mantel-Haenszel fixed effect and the DerSimonian-Laird random effects model. Five randomized controlled trials were included. Administration of probiotics, compared with control, was beneficial in terms of incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (689 patients; fixed effect model: odds ratio, 0.61; 95% confidence interval, 0.41–0.91; random effects model: odds ratio, 0.55, 95% confidence interval, 0.31–0.98), length of intensive care unit stay (fixed effect model: weighted mean difference, –0.99 days; 95% confidence interval, –1.37–−0.61), and colonization of the respiratory tract with Pseudomonas aeruginosa (odds ratio, 0.35; 95% confidence interval, 0.13–0.93). However, no difference was revealed between comparators regarding intensive care unit mortality (odds ratio, 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.47–1.21), in-hospital mortality (odds ratio, 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.46–1.24), duration of mechanical ventilation (weighted mean difference, –0.01 days; 95% confidence interval, –0.31–−0.29), and diarrhea (odds ratio, 0.61; 95% confidence interval, 0.28–1.34). Administration of probiotics is associated with lower incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia than control. Given the increasing antimicrobial resistance, this promising strategy deserves consideration in future studies, which should have active surveillance for probiotic-induced diseases.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Probiotics for the prevention of respiratory tract infections: a systematic reviewInternational Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, 2009
- Probiotics in the intensive care unitCurrent Opinion in Critical Care, 2009
- Adjunctive therapies for community-acquired pneumonia: a systematic reviewJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 2008
- Mechanisms of Action of ProbioticsClinical Infectious Diseases, 2008
- Clinical Indications for Probiotics: An OverviewClinical Infectious Diseases, 2008
- Probiotics in the intensive care unit: why controversies and confusion aboundCritical Care, 2008
- Impact of passive humidification on clinical outcomes of mechanically ventilated patients: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials*Critical Care Medicine, 2007
- Probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics—approaching a definitionThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2001
- Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statementThe Lancet, 1999
- Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?The Lancet, 1998