Analysing body condition: mass, volume or density?
Open Access
- 14 October 2008
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Animal Ecology
- Vol. 77 (6), 1099-1108
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01433.x
Abstract
1 Body condition (defined as the relative amount of energy reserves in the body) is an animal trait with strong ecological implications. In some animal taxa (e.g. arthropods), the external volume of the body part in which most nutrients are stored (e.g. abdomen) is used interchangeably with body mass to estimate body condition, making the implicit assumption that abdomen residual volume is a good surrogate of residual mass. However, the degree of correlation between these two measures should largely depend on the density of the nutrients stored. 2 We simulated two food‐supplemented experimental groups of animals, each storing a slightly different amount of lipids either in their abdomens or in their entire bodies, and explored (i) how different estimates of condition were able to detect fixed differences between the groups; and (ii) how the amount of lipids stored could affect the outcome of non‐intrusive measures of condition on a dichotomous variable (e.g. survival, mating success). We found that density body condition (body mass statistically controlled for structural body size and body volume) has much greater power to detect differences between experimental groups or effects on binary response variables than do classic mass/size or volume/size condition indices. 3 Using data on Lycosa tarantula (L.), a burrowing wolf spider, we report dramatic differences among these three indices in their ability to detect sex differences in the effect of feeding treatment on body condition at maturity. In particular, a plot of residual mass against residual volume reflecting nutrient density suggests that poorly fed spiders are nutritionally unbalanced, since well‐fed spiders invest in nutrients of very different density. 4 Furthermore, using data on Scathophaga stercoraria (L.), the yellow dung fly, we found that an index of density condition was better at distinguishing condition differences among three populations than were mass or volume condition estimates alone. 5 We propose that including these three surrogates of condition (mass, volume and density) will substantially improve the accuracy of non‐intrusive estimates of body condition, thus providing more powerful tools with direct application in a wide range of disciplines.Keywords
This publication has 54 references indexed in Scilit:
- Role of dFOXO in lifespan extension by dietary restriction in Drosophila melanogaster: not required, but its activity modulates the responseAging Cell, 2007
- Two simple strategies of analysis to increase the power of experiments with multiple response variablesBasic and Applied Ecology, 2007
- Sex differences in body composition, performance and behaviour in the Colombian rainbow boa (Epicrates cenchria maurus, Boidae)Journal of Zoology, 2006
- Larval food limitation in butterflies: effects on adult resource allocation and fitnessOecologia, 2005
- Evaluating body condition of striped skunks using non-invasive morphometric indices and bioelectrical impedance analysisWildlife Society Bulletin, 2005
- Selection on male size, leg length and condition during mate search in a sexually highly dimorphic orb-weaving spiderOecologia, 2004
- Reproductive roles predict sexual dimorphism in internal and external morphology of lake whitefish, Coregonus clupeaformisEcology of Freshwater Fish, 2004
- Lipid dynamics in the viperine snake, Natrix maura, from the Ebro Delta (NE Spain)Oikos, 2004
- Capacity of Bembidion lampros and Tachyporus hypnorum to survive periods of starvation in early springEntomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 1999
- Evaluating Nutritional Condition of Grizzly Bears via Select Blood ParametersThe Journal of Wildlife Management, 1999