Two types of ‘enough’: sufficiency as minimum and maximum
- 28 March 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in Environmental Politics
- Vol. 25 (5), 921-940
- https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2016.1164355
Abstract
The question ‘how much is enough?’ can be related to two different kinds of thresholds: minimum and maximum levels. Two separate discussions on these levels are held within two different research fields – abstract justice theory and practical environmental science – and both use the term ‘sufficiency’ to denominate their subject. The discussion in each research field is concentrated almost exclusively on either minimum or maximum levels. It is argued instead that both are closely linked to each other and that the combination of both types of thresholds actually results in what the concept of sustainability demands. The aims here are to bring these two sufficiency debates together and to explore conceptual links as well as differences.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Justice and the distribution of greenhouse gas emissions1Journal of Global Ethics, 2009
- Sufficiency – does energy consumption become a moral issue?IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2009
- Ecology and the Limits of Justice: Establishing Capability Ceilings in Nussbaum's Capabilities ApproachJournal of Human Development, 2008
- The sufficiency strategy: Would rich-world frugality lower environmental impact?Ecological Economics, 2008
- Justice Between Generations: Investigating a Sufficientarian ApproachJournal of Global Ethics, 2007
- Why Sufficiency Is Not EnoughEthics, 2007
- Equality, Priority, and CompassionEthics, 2003
- The Law of PeoplesCritical Inquiry, 1993
- Equality as a Moral IdealEthics, 1987
- Impact of Population GrowthScience, 1971