Comparative Effectiveness of Noninvasive Ventilation vs Invasive Mechanical Ventilation in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients With Acute Respiratory Failure
- 11 February 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Hospital Medicine
- Vol. 8 (4), 165-172
- https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.2014
Abstract
BACKGROUNDLimited evidence exists on the comparative effectiveness of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) vs invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) in acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) patients with respiratory failure.OBJECTIVESTo characterize the use of NIV and IMV, and to compare the effectiveness of NIV vs IMV in AECOPD.DESIGN AND PATIENTSRetrospective cohort study using data from the 2006–2008 Nationwide Emergency Department Sample. Emergency department visits for AECOPD with acute respiratory failure were identified with codes from the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification.MEASURESThe outcome measures were inpatient mortality, hospital length of stay, hospital charges, and complications.RESULTSThere were an estimated 101,000 visits annually for AECOPD with acute respiratory failure; 96% were admitted to the hospital. Of these, NIV use increased from 14% in 2006 to 16% in 2008 (P=0.049). Use of NIV, however, varied widely between hospitals, ranging from 0% to 100% with a median of 11%. Noninvasive ventilation was more often used in higher–case volume, Northeastern hospitals. In a propensity score analysis, NIV use, compared with IMV, was associated with lower inpatient mortality (risk ratio: 0.54, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.50‐0.59), shortened hospital length of stay (−3.2 days; 95% CI: −3.4 to −2.9 days), lower hospital charges (−$35,012; 95% CI: −$36,848 to −$33,176), and lower risk of iatrogenic pneumothorax (0.05% vs 0.5%, PKeywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Age-related differences in clinical outcomes for acute asthma in the United States, 2006-2008Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2012
- National Study of Emergency Department Visits for Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, 1993–2005Academic Emergency Medicine, 2008
- Noninvasive vs Conventional Mechanical Ventilation in Acute Respiratory FailureSocial psychiatry. Sozialpsychiatrie. Psychiatrie sociale, 2005
- Trends in the Leading Causes of Death in the United States, 1970-2002JAMA, 2005
- Mechanical ventilation: invasive versus noninvasiveEuropean Respiratory Journal, 2003
- Noninvasive vs. conventional mechanical ventilation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease after failure of medical treatment in the ward: a randomized trialIntensive Care Medicine, 2002
- Early use of non-invasive ventilation for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on general respiratory wards: a multicentre randomised controlled trialThe Lancet, 2000
- Comorbidity Measures for Use with Administrative DataMedical Care, 1998
- Noninvasive Ventilation for Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1995
- Randomised controlled trial of nasal ventilation in acute ventilatory failure due to chronic obstructive airways diseaseThe Lancet, 1993