Scientific and Regulatory Reasons for Delay and Denial of FDA Approval of Initial Applications for New Drugs, 2000-2012
Open Access
- 22 January 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA)
- Vol. 311 (4), 378-384
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.282542
Abstract
The road from medical product discovery to marketing is typically long and costly. The interval between initial clinical testing and product approval has been estimated to average 8 years1 and only 1 in 6 drugs entering clinical trials ultimately obtains US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval.2 Quiz Ref ID To obtain marketing approval for new drugs, developers must provide substantial evidence of safety and efficacy for the proposed indication.3 In a number of failed applications, deficiencies are successfully addressed in resubmissions resulting in delayed approval, whereas others are never approved for marketing. Nonapproval of drugs is critical to prevent the marketing of ineffective or harmful products. However, many drugs are not approved not because they are unsafe or ineffective, but because the information is unsatisfactory to make that determination. Delays and failures that occur late in development affect the availability of innovative new drugs and increase the costs of drug development.4 To avoid preventable late-stage deficiencies in drug development and their negative consequences, it is important to understand the nature of these deficiencies.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reform, Regulation, and Pharmaceuticals — The Kefauver–Harris Amendments at 50New England Journal of Medicine, 2012
- Why Do Phase III Clinical Trials in Oncology Fail so Often?JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2012
- Assumptions of Expected Benefits in Randomized Phase III Trials Evaluating Systemic Treatments for CancerJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2012
- Pharmaceutical Innovation in the 21st Century: New Drug Approvals in the First Decade, 2000–2009Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 2010
- Trends in Risks Associated With New Drug Development: Success Rates for Investigational DrugsClinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 2010
- Balancing early market access to new drugs with the need for benefit/risk data: a mounting dilemmaNature Reviews Drug Discovery, 2008
- Confirmatory Seamless Phase II/III Clinical Trials with Hypotheses Selection at Interim: General ConceptsBiometrical Journal, 2006
- Objective Responses in Patients with Malignant Melanoma or Renal Cell Cancer in Early Clinical Studies Do Not Predict Regulatory ApprovalClinical Cancer Research, 2005
- Can the pharmaceutical industry reduce attrition rates?Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 2004
- Surrogate End Points in Clinical Trials: Are We Being Misled?Annals of Internal Medicine, 1996