Do clinically relevant transthoracic defibrillation energies cause myocardial damage and dysfunction?
- 1 October 2003
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Resuscitation
- Vol. 59 (1), 59-70
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0300-9572(03)00161-8
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 58 references indexed in Scilit:
- A C OMPARISON OF B IPHASIC AND M ONOPHASIC S HOCKS FOR E XTERNAL D EFIBRILLATIONPrehospital Emergency Care, 2000
- The influence of electrical cardioversion on superoxide anions (O2−) production by polymorphonuclear neutrophils, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) plasma level and malondialdehyde serum concentrationInternational Journal of Cardiology, 1996
- Threshold energy dose for enzyme release after direct-current countershockInternational Journal of Cardiology, 1996
- Ventricular defibrillation using biphasic waveforms: The importance of phasic durationJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1989
- Relationship of left ventricular mass to defibrillation threshold for the implantable defibrillator: A combined clinical and animal studyAmerican Heart Journal, 1987
- Cardiac-specific troponin-l radioimmunoassay in the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarctionAmerican Heart Journal, 1987
- Ventricular Defibrillation — A Comparative Trial Using 175-J and 320-J ShocksNew England Journal of Medicine, 1982
- Effect of direct-current countershocks on regional myocardial contractility and perfusion. Experimental studies.Cell Metabolism, 1981
- Evidence of voltage-induced channel opening in Na/K ATPase of human erythrocyte membraneThe Journal of Membrane Biology, 1980
- Therapeutic indices for transchest defibrillator shocks: Effective, damaging, and lethal electrical dosesAmerican Heart Journal, 1980