Improving surveillance for Barrett's oesophagus
- 1 June 2006
- Vol. 332 (7553), 1320-1323
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.332.7553.1320
Abstract
Problem A retrospective audit of surveillance for Barrett's oesophagus 1996-2001 identified the need to improve adherence to guidelines for the endoscopic surveillance of patients with Barrett's oesophagus. Design Prospective audit of the effect of disseminating guidelines in 2002. Prospective audit of the effect of introducing local guidelines and Barrett's oesophagus surveillance officers, 2003-2005. Setting Two general hospitals in Australia, 2002-5. All adult patients diagnosed with Barrett's oesophagus were included. Key measures for improvement Proportions of patients in a Barrett's oesophagus surveillance programme who had appropriate time intervals between follow-up endoscopies and who had appropriate numbers of biopsies collected at endoscopy. Strategies for change Local guidelines were laid down. Surveillance coordinators for Barrett's oesophagus were introduced to manage the process according to a clinical protocol designed for each patient. Effects of change Disseminating guidelines had little effect on practice. Six months after surveillance coordinators were introduced, adherence to the planned surveillance interval increased from 17% to 92% and the number of endoscopies at which sufficient biopsies were collected increased from 45% to 83%. These changes have been maintained. Lessons learnt Disseminating guidelines and results of an audit on endoscopic surveillance in Barrett's oesophagus had no effect on practice. Introducing coordinators who proactively managed the process greatly improved adherence to guidelines.This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effect of surveillance of Barrett's oesophagus on the clinical outcome of oesophageal cancerBritish Journal of Surgery, 2004
- Surveillance for Barrett's oesophagus: if you do it, do it properly.The Medical Journal of Australia, 2004
- Audit of a Barrett's epithelium surveillance databaseEuropean Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 2004
- Current practice in surveillance strategy for patients with Barrett's oesophagus in the UKAlimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 2003
- Applying evidence‐based guidelines improves use of colonoscopy resources in patients with a moderate risk of colorectal neoplasiaThe Medical Journal of Australia, 2002
- Esophageal adenocarcinoma arising from Barrett's metaplasia has regional variations in the westGastroenterology, 2002
- Is there publication bias in the reporting of cancer risk in Barrett's esophagus?Gastroenterology, 2000
- Management of Barrett's esophagus. The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract (SSAT), American Gastroenterological Association (AGA), American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) Consensus Panel.2000
- Impact of endoscopic biopsy surveillance of Barrett’s oesophagus on pathological stage and clinical outcome of Barrett’s carcinomaGut, 1998
- Practice Guidelines on the Diagnosis, Surveillance, and Therapy of Barrett's EsophagusThe American Journal of Gastroenterology, 1998