Tarski ‐ a dilemma
- 1 January 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Informa UK Limited in Inquiry
- Vol. 30 (1), 155-172
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00201748708602115
Abstract
Tarski's correspondence theory of truth (which he spells out in his semantic conception of truth) is open to two interpretations. This ambiguity in the theory has led philosophers to find support in it for metaphysical reali sm. In fact, Tarski's theory turns out to support a form of ontological relativism. In different passages Tarski himself gives support to each of these interpretations. The first interpretation leads to ontological relativism, while the second sacrifices the connection between language and the world. I clarify the dilemma that I see in having to choose between these two interpretations, explain how these interpretations have their source in different problems which occupied Tarski, and consider a possible solution to the dilemma. Finally, finding good reasons to claim that Tarski's theory is indeed a correspondence theory of truth, I argue in favour of the first interpretation with its relativistic implications.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Tarski a Relativist?Analysis, 1985
- Popper, Tarski and RelativismAnalysis, 1983
- ‘Is it True What They Say About Tarski?’Philosophy, 1976
- True to the FactsThe Journal of Philosophy, 1969
- The Semantic Conception of Truth: and the Foundations of SemanticsPhilosophy and Phenomenological Research, 1944