How should we normalize electromyograms obtained from healthy participants? What we have learned from over 25years of research
Top Cited Papers
- 31 December 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology
- Vol. 20 (6), 1023-1035
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2010.07.004
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 58 references indexed in Scilit:
- An assessment of the reliability and standardisation of tests used to elicit reference muscular actions for electromyographical normalisationJournal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 2010
- Normalization procedures using maximum voluntary isometric contractions for the serratus anterior and trapezius muscles during surface EMG analysisJournal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 2005
- Reliability of EMG measurements for trunk muscles during maximal and sub-maximal voluntary isometric contractions in healthy controls and CLBP patientsJournal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 2004
- Normalisation of gait EMGs: a re-examinationJournal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 2003
- EMG signal amplitude assessment during abdominal bracing and hollowingJournal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 1998
- The effects of normalization method on antagonistic activity patterns during eccentric and concentric isokinetic knee extension and flexionJournal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 1996
- Reliability of non-normalized and normalized integrated EMG during maximal isometric contractions in femalesJournal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 1996
- Normalizing upper trapezius EMG amplitude: Comparison of different proceduresJournal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 1995
- The Effect of the Rate of Muscle Contraction on the Force-Time Curve Parameters of Male and Female SubjectsResearch Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 1990
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986