Factors associated with complete clip closure after endoscopic mucosal resection of large colorectal polyps
- 8 December 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Georg Thieme Verlag KG in Endoscopy
- Vol. 53 (11), 1150-1159
- https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1332-6727
Abstract
Background. Delayed bleeding is a common adverse event following endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of large colorectal polyps. Prophylactic clip closure of the mucosal defect after EMR of ≥20 mm non-pedunculated polyps reduces the incidence of severe delayed bleeding, especially in proximal polyps. Aim: Evaluate factors associated with complete prophylactic clip closure of the mucosal defect after EMR of large polyps. Methods: This is a post-hoc analysis of the CLIP STUDY (NCT01936948). All patients randomized to the clip group were included. Main outcome was complete clip closure of the mucosal resection defect. The defect was considered completely closed when there was no remaining visible mucosal defect and clips were <1cm apart. Factors associated with complete closure were evaluated in multivariable analysis. Results: 458 patients (age 65, 58% men) with 494 large polyps were included. Complete clip closure of the resection defect was achieved for 338 polyps (68.4%) and was not complete for 156 (31.6%). Factors associated with complete closure in adjusted analysis were smaller polyp size (OR 1.06 for every mm decrease [1.02-1.08]), good access (OR 3.58 [1.94-9.59]), complete submucosal lifting (OR 2.28 [1.36-3.90]), en bloc resection (OR 5.75 [1.48-22.39]), and serrated histology (OR 2.74 [1.35-5.56]). Conclusions: Complete clip closure was not achieved for almost 1 out of 3 resected large non-pedunculated polyps. While stable access and en bloc resection facilitate clip closure, most factors associated with clip closure are not modifiable and highlight the need for alternative closure options and preventative bleeding measures. Received: 10 July 2020 Accepted after revision: 08 December 2020 Publication Date: 08 December 2020 (online) © 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, GermanyThis publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Clip Closure After Resection of Large Colorectal Lesions With Substantial Risk of BleedingGastroenterology, 2019
- Clip Closure Prevents Bleeding After Endoscopic Resection of Large Colon Polyps in a Randomized TrialGastroenterology, 2019
- A Scoring System to Determine Risk of Delayed Bleeding After Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Large Colorectal LesionsClinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 2016
- Outcome of EMR as an alternative to surgery in patients with complex colon polypsGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2016
- Long-term adenoma recurrence following wide-field endoscopic mucosal resection (WF-EMR) for advanced colonic mucosal neoplasia is infrequent: results and risk factors in 1000 cases from the Australian Colonic EMR (ACE) studyGut, 2014
- Risk Factors for Intraprocedural and Clinically Significant Delayed Bleeding After Wide-field Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Large Colonic LesionsClinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 2013
- Prophylactic clip closure reduced the risk of delayed postpolypectomy hemorrhage: experience in 277 clipped large sessile or flat colorectal lesions and 247 control lesionsGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2013
- Location in the Right Hemi-Colon Is an Independent Risk Factor for Delayed Post-Polypectomy Hemorrhage: A Multi-Center Case–Control StudyThe American Journal of Gastroenterology, 2011
- Risk factors for severe delayed postpolypectomy bleedingEndoscopy, 2008
- The Munich Polypectomy Study (MUPS): Prospective Analysis of Complications and Risk Factors in 4000 Colonic Snare PolypectomiesEndoscopy, 2005