Findings from a mobile application–based cohort are consistent with established knowledge of the menstrual cycle, fertile window, and conception
- 1 July 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Fertility and Sterility
- Vol. 112 (3), 450-457.e3
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.05.008
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- The normal variabilities of the menstrual cycleFertility and Sterility, 2009
- Estimation of the day‐specific probabilities of conception: current state of the knowledge and the relevance for epidemiological researchPaediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 2006
- Bayesian Inferences on Predictors of Conception ProbabilitiesBiometrics, 2005
- Vulvar mucus observations and the probability of pregnancyObstetrics & Gynecology, 2003
- Cycle characteristics after discontinuation of oral contraceptivesGynecological Endocrinology, 2002
- Daily FecundabilityDemographic Research, 2000
- Normal variation in the length of the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle: identification of the short luteal phaseBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1984
- Normal variation in the length of the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle: effect of chronological ageBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1984
- Rise in Female-Initiated Sexual Activity at Ovulation and Its Suppression by Oral ContraceptivesThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1978
- OUR KNOWLEDGE OF THE MENSTRUAL CYCLE, 1910-1950The Lancet, 1951