Collective judgment predicts disease-associated single nucleotide variants
Open Access
- 1 January 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in BMC Genomics
- Vol. 14 (Suppl 3), S2
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-14-s3-s2
Abstract
In recent years the number of human genetic variants deposited into the publicly available databases has been increasing exponentially. The latest version of dbSNP, for example, contains ~50 million validated Single Nucleotide Variants (SNVs). SNVs make up most of human variation and are often the primary causes of disease. The non-synonymous SNVs (nsSNVs) result in single amino acid substitutions and may affect protein function, often causing disease. Although several methods for the detection of nsSNV effects have already been developed, the consistent increase in annotated data is offering the opportunity to improve prediction accuracy. Here we present a new approach for the detection of disease-associated nsSNVs (Meta-SNP) that integrates four existing methods: PANTHER, PhD-SNP, SIFT and SNAP. We first tested the accuracy of each method using a dataset of 35,766 disease-annotated mutations from 8,667 proteins extracted from the SwissVar database. The four methods reached overall accuracies of 64%-76% with a Matthew's correlation coefficient (MCC) of 0.38-0.53. We then used the outputs of these methods to develop a machine learning based approach that discriminates between disease-associated and polymorphic variants (Meta-SNP). In testing, the combined method reached 79% overall accuracy and 0.59 MCC, ~3% higher accuracy and ~0.05 higher correlation with respect to the best-performing method. Moreover, for the hardest-to-define subset of nsSNVs, i.e. variants for which half of the predictors disagreed with the other half, Meta-SNP attained 8% higher accuracy than the best predictor. Here we find that the Meta-SNP algorithm achieves better performance than the best single predictor. This result suggests that the methods used for the prediction of variant-disease associations are orthogonal, encoding different biologically relevant relationships. Careful combination of predictions from various resources is therefore a good strategy for the selection of high reliability predictions. Indeed, for the subset of nsSNVs where all predictors were in agreement (46% of all nsSNVs in the set), our method reached 87% overall accuracy and 0.73 MCC. Meta-SNP server is freely accessible at http://snps.biofold.org/meta-snp .This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Interpreting noncoding genetic variation in complex traits and human diseaseNature Biotechnology, 2012
- A new disease-specific machine learning approach for the prediction of cancer-causing missense variantsGenomics, 2011
- Improving the Assessment of the Outcome of Nonsynonymous SNVs with a Consensus Deleteriousness Score, CondelAmerican Journal of Human Genetics, 2011
- A map of human genome variation from population-scale sequencingNature, 2010
- Easy retrieval of single amino-acid polymorphisms and phenotype information using SwissVarBioinformatics, 2010
- Automated inference of molecular mechanisms of disease from amino acid substitutionsBioinformatics, 2009
- Functional annotations improve the predictive score of human disease-related mutations in proteinsHuman Mutation, 2009
- Genetic Risk Prediction — Are We There Yet?The New England Journal of Medicine, 2009
- Use of estimated evolutionary strength at the codon level improves the prediction of disease-related protein mutations in humansHuman Mutation, 2007
- Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD®): 2003 updateHuman Mutation, 2003