Biomechanical evaluation of posterior lumbar dynamic stabilization: an in vitro comparison between Universal Clamp and Wallis systems
- 4 December 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in European Spine Journal
- Vol. 20 (2), 289-296
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-010-1641-1
Abstract
Treatment of chronic low back pain due to degenerative lumbar spine conditions often involves fusion of the symptomatic level. A known risk of this procedure is accelerated adjacent level degeneration. Motion preservation devices have been designed to provide stabilization to the symptomatic motion segment while preserving some physiologic motion. The aim of this study was to compare the changes in relative range of motion caused as a result of application of two non-fusion, dynamic stabilization devices: the Universal Clamp (UC) and the Wallis device. Nine fresh, frozen human lumbar spines (L1–Sacrum) were tested in flexion–extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation with a custom spine simulator. Specimens were tested in four conditions: (1) intact, (2) the Universal Clamp implanted at L3–4 (UC), (3) the UC with a transverse rod added (UCTR), and (4) the Wallis device implanted at L3–4. Total range of motion at 7.5 N-m was determined for each device and compared to intact condition. The UC device (with or without a transverse rod) restricted motion in all planes more than the Wallis. The greatest restriction was observed in flexion. The neutral position of the L3–4 motion segment shifted toward extension with the UC and UCTR. Motion at the adjacent levels remained similar to that observed in the intact spine for all three constructs. These results suggest that the UC device may be an appropriate dynamic stabilization device for degenerative lumbar disorders.Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Biomechanical evaluation of a new fixation device for the thoracic spineEuropean Spine Journal, 2009
- Does Wallis implant reduce adjacent segment degeneration above lumbosacral instrumented fusion?European Spine Journal, 2009
- Clinical evaluation of a lumbar interspinous dynamic stabilization device (the Wallis system) with a 13-year mean follow-upNeurosurgical Review, 2009
- Efficacy and safety of posteromedial translation for correction of thoracic curves in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using a new connection to the spine: the Universal ClampEuropean Spine Journal, 2008
- The effect of dynamic, semi-rigid implants on the range of motion of lumbar motion segments after decompressionEuropean Spine Journal, 2008
- Biomechanical effect of different lumbar interspinous implants on flexibility and intradiscal pressureEuropean Spine Journal, 2008
- Long-term actuarial survivorship analysis of an interspinous stabilization systemEuropean Spine Journal, 2007
- Biomechanical characterization of the three-dimensional kinematic behaviour of the Dynesys dynamic stabilization system: an in vitro studyEuropean Spine Journal, 2005
- Long-term follow-up of functional outcomes and radiographic changes at adjacent levels following lumbar spine fusion for degenerative disc diseaseEuropean Spine Journal, 2000
- Testing criteria for spinal implants: recommendations for the standardization of in vitro stability testing of spinal implantsEuropean Spine Journal, 1998