Moments in Time: Metacognition, Trust, and Outcomes in Dyadic Negotiations
- 1 December 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
- Vol. 31 (12), 1696-1707
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167205278306
Abstract
This research tested the relationships between turning points, cognitive and affective trust, and negotiation outcomes. After completing a simulated negotiation, participants identified turning points from videotape. Turning points were then classified as substantive (interest, offer), characterization (positive, negative), or procedural (positive, negative). Prenegotiation affective trust predicted subsequent turning points, whereas prenegotiation cognitive trust did not, suggesting that different cues influence the two types of trust. Postnegotiation cognitive trust was increased by the occurrence of interest, positive characterization, and positive procedural turning points and decreased by negative characterization turning points. Affective trust was increased by positive procedural turning points. Finally, interest turning points resulted in higher joint outcomes, whereas negative characterization turning points resulted in lower joint outcomes. We conclude that there are two paths to building trust and increasing joint gain, one through insight and one through signaling good faith intentions.This publication has 51 references indexed in Scilit:
- Negotiating interests or values and reaching integrative agreements: the importance of time pressure and temporary impassesEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 2004
- The Dissatisfaction of Having Your First Offer Accepted: The Role of Counterfactual Thinking in NegotiationsPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2002
- Perceptions of Dialectical Contradictions in Turning Points of Development in Heterosexual Romantic RelationshipsJournal of Social and Personal Relationships, 1999
- What Novices Think About Negotiation: A Content Analysis of ScriptsNegotiation Journal, 1999
- Initial Trust Formation in New Organizational RelationshipsAcademy of Management Review, 1998
- A Formal Model of Trust Based on OutcomesAcademy of Management Review, 1998
- The Grammars of Trust: A Model and General ImplicationsAcademy of Management Review, 1998
- Social perception in negotiationOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1990
- TACTICAL BEHAVIOR AND NEGOTIATION OUTCOMESInternational Journal of Conflict Management, 1990
- Effects of trust, aspiration, and gender on negotiation tactics.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980