Validity of Teleneuropsychological Assessment in Older Patients with Cognitive Disorders
- 10 January 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
- Vol. 33 (8), 1040-1045
- https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acx140
Abstract
Objective The feasibility and reliability of neuropsychological assessment at a distance have been demonstrated, but the validity of this testing medium has not been adequately demonstrated. The purpose of this study was to determine the ability of video teleconferencing administration of neuropsychological measures (teleneuropsychology) in discriminating cognitively impaired from non-impaired groups of older adults. It was predicted that measures administered via video teleconference would distinguish groups and that the magnitude of differences between impaired and non-impaired groups would be similar to group differences achieved in traditional administration. Methods The sample consisted of 197 older subjects, separated into two groups, with and without cognitive impairment. The cognitive impairment group included 78 individuals with clinical diagnoses of mild cognitive impairment or Alzheimer’s disease. All participants completed counterbalanced neuropsychological testing using alternate test forms in both a teleneuropsychology and a traditional face-to-face (FTF) administration condition. Tests were selected based upon their common use in dementia evaluations, brevity, and assessment of multiple cognitive domains. Results from FTF and teleneuropsychology test conditions were compared using individual repeated measures ANCOVA, controlling for age, education, gender, and depression scores. Results All ANCOVA models revealed significant main effects of group and a non-significant interaction between group and administration condition. All ANCOVA models revealed non-significant main effects for administration condition, except category fluency. Conclusions Results derived from teleneuropsychologically administered tests can distinguish between cognitively impaired and non-impaired individuals similar to traditional FTF assessment. This adds to the growing teleneuropsychology literature by supporting the validity of remote assessments in aging populations.Keywords
Funding Information
- NIH
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Feasibility of Telecognitive Assessment in DementiaAssessment, 2006
- Efficacy of language assessment in Alzheimer's disease: comparing in-person examination and telemedicineClinical Interventions in Aging, 2006
- Cognitive intervention for community‐dwelling older persons with memory problems: telemedicine versus face‐to‐face treatmentInternational Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 2005
- Validity of the Clock-Drawing Test as a Screening Tool for Cognitive Impairment in the ElderlyAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2004
- Mild cognitive impairment as a diagnostic entityJournal of Internal Medicine, 2004
- Can patients with dementia be assessed at a distance? The use of Telehealth and standardised assessmentsInternal Medicine Journal, 2004
- Statistics to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth Formulae, illustrative numerical examples, and heuristic interpretation of effect size analyses for neuropsychological researchersArchives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 2001
- Construct and Concurrent Validity of the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test – RevisedThe Clinical Neuropsychologist, 1999
- Hopkins Verbal Learning Test – Revised: Normative Data and Analysis of Inter-Form and Test-Retest ReliabilityThe Clinical Neuropsychologist, 1998
- “Mini-mental state”: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinicianJournal of Psychiatric Research, 1975