Survival of the Ideas that Fit: An Evolutionary Analogy for the Use of Evidence in Policy
- 4 January 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Social Policy and Society
- Vol. 6 (1), 25-35
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s1474746406003319
Abstract
This paper explores bias in the use of evidence in policy. It argues that existing models of the evidence–policy relationship neglect the tendency for attention to be paid only to that evidence helpful to the interests of powerful social groups. An evolutionary analogy is used to explain how this bias arises, without the need for irrationality or conspiracy on the part of policy makers. Examples are given in the fields of drug, asylum and other policies, and the possible responses by researchers to the biased use of research evidence are discussed.This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- ‘Evidence-based policy’ and the government of the criminal justice system - only if the evidence fits!Critical Social Policy, 2005
- Quasi-Compulsory Treatment of Drug Dependent Offenders: An International Literature ReviewSubstance Use & Misuse, 2005
- GM crops: good or bad?EMBO Reports, 2004
- Evaluation, Policy Learning and Evidence‐Based Policy MakingPublic Administration, 2002