Efficacy, pharmacodynamics, and safety of VX‐702, a novel p38 MAPK inhibitor, in rheumatoid arthritis: Results of two randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled clinical studies
- 29 April 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Arthritis & Rheumatism
- Vol. 60 (5), 1232-1241
- https://doi.org/10.1002/art.24485
Abstract
Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of VX‐702, a p38 MAPK inhibitor, in patients with active, moderate‐to‐severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods Two 12‐week, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled studies of VX‐702 were conducted in patients with active, moderate‐to‐severe RA. In the VeRA study, 313 patients received placebo or 2 daily doses of VX‐702. In Study 304, 117 patients received placebo, daily VX‐702, or twice weekly VX‐702 in addition to concomitant methotrexate (MTX). Study end points included the proportion of patients meeting the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria (an ACR20 response), ACR50 and ACR70 responses, changes in the serum levels of biomarkers of inflammation, and safety assessments. Results The numerically superior ACR20 response rates among patients receiving VX‐702 compared with those receiving placebo in both studies did not reach pairwise statistical significance at the highest doses in either study. At week 12 in the VeRA study, ACR20 response rates were 40%, 36%, and 28% among patients receiving 10 mg of VX‐702, 5 mg of VX‐702, and placebo, respectively. In Study 304, the response rates were 40%, 44%, and 22% for patients receiving 10 mg VX‐702 daily plus MTX, 10 mg VX‐702 twice weekly plus MTX, and placebo, respectively. Reductions in the levels of C‐reactive protein, soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor p55, and serum amyloid A were observed as early as week 1 in both studies, but these levels rapidly returned to baseline values by week 4. The overall frequency of adverse events was similar between the VX‐702 and placebo groups. In the VeRA study, serious infections were more frequent in the VX‐702 groups compared with the placebo group (2.4% versus 0%) but not in Study 304 (2.6% versus 4.9%). Conclusion The modest clinical efficacy plus the transient suppression of biomarkers of inflammation observed in this study suggest that p38 MAPK inhibition may not provide meaningful, sustained suppression of the chronic inflammation seen in RA.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Ocrelizumab, a humanized anti‐CD20 monoclonal antibody, in the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A phase I/II randomized, blinded, placebo‐controlled, dose‐ranging studyArthritis & Rheumatism, 2008
- New therapies for treatment of rheumatoid arthritisThe Lancet, 2007
- Emerging cytokine targets in rheumatoid arthritisCurrent Opinion in Rheumatology, 2007
- Joint inflammation and cytokine inhibition in rheumatoid arthritisClinical and Experimental Medicine, 2006
- The Biology of p38 Kinase: A Central Role in InflammationCurrent Topics in Medicinal Chemistry, 2005
- Pathogenesis of Rheumatoid Arthritis: Targeting CytokinesAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2005
- Prevention of the onset and progression of collagen‐induced arthritis in rats by the potent p38 mitogen‐activated protein kinase inhibitor FR167653Arthritis & Rheumatism, 2003
- p38 MAP kinases: key signalling molecules as therapeutic targets for inflammatory diseasesNature Reviews Drug Discovery, 2003
- Etanercept Therapy in Rheumatoid ArthritisAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1999
- Development and Validation of Response Criteria in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Steps Towards an International Consensus on Prognostic MarkersRheumatology, 1996