Question/Answer Congruence and the Semantics of wh-phrases
- 1 January 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH in Theoretical Linguistics
- Vol. 28 (1), 73-94
- https://doi.org/10.1515/thli.2002.28.1.73
Abstract
This paper is about the semantics of wh-phrases. It is argued that wh-phrases should not be analyzed as indefinites as, for example, Karttunen (1977) and many others have done, but as functional expressions with an indefinite core - their function being to restrict possible focus/background structures in direct or congruent answers. This will be argued for on the basis of observations made with respect to the distribution of term answers in well-formed question/answer sequences. This claim having been established, it will then be integrated into a variant of Schwarzschild's (1999) information-theoretical approach to F-marking and accent placement, and - second - its consequences with respect to the focus/background structure of wh-questions will be outlined.This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- GIVENNESS, AVOIDF AND OTHER CONSTRAINTS ON THE PLACEMENT OF ACCENT*Natural Language Semantics, 1999
- A theory of focus interpretationNatural Language Semantics, 1992
- Focus AmbiguitiesJournal of Semantics, 1991
- Syntax and semantics of questionsLinguistics and Philosophy, 1977
- Notes on transitivity and theme in English Part IJournal of Linguistics, 1967