Individual Patient Data Analysis of Progression-Free Survival Versus Overall Survival As a First-Line End Point for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in Modern Randomized Trials: Findings From the Analysis and Research in Cancers of the Digestive System Database
- 1 January 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 33 (1), 22-28
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2014.56.5887
Abstract
Purpose: Progression-free survival (PFS) has previously been established as a surrogate for overall survival (OS) for first-line metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Because mCRC treatment has advanced in the last decade with extended OS, this surrogacy requires re-examination. Methods: Individual patient data from 16,762 patients were available from 22 first-line mCRC studies conducted from 1997 to 2006; 12 of those studies tested antiangiogenic and/or anti–epidermal growth factor receptor agents. The relationship between PFS (first event of progression or death) and OS was evaluated by using R2 statistics (the closer the value is to 1, the stronger the correlation) from weighted least squares regression of trial-specific hazard ratios estimated by using Cox and Copula models. Results: Forty-four percent of patients received a regimen that included biologic agents. Median first-line PFS was 8.3 months, and median OS was 18.2 months. The correlation between PFS and OS was modest (R2, 0.45 to 0.69). Analyses limited to trials that tested treatments with biologic agents, nonstrategy trials, or superiority trials did not improve surrogacy. Conclusion: In modern mCRC trials, in which survival after the first progression exceeds time to first progression, a positive but modest correlation was observed between OS and PFS at both the patient and trial levels. This finding demonstrates the substantial variability in OS introduced by the number of lines of therapy and types of effective subsequent treatments and the associated challenge to the use of OS as an end point to assess the benefit attributable to a single line of therapy. PFS remains an appropriate primary end point for first-line mCRC trials to detect the direct treatment effect of new agents.This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- Capecitabine, Bevacizumab, and Mitomycin in First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Results of the Australasian Gastrointestinal Trials Group Randomized Phase III MAX StudyJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2010
- Detecting an Overall Survival Benefit that Is Derived From Progression-Free SurvivalJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2009
- Progression-Free Survival Is a Surrogate for Survival in Advanced Colorectal CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2007
- Surrogate End Points for Median Overall Survival in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Literature-Based Analysis From 39 Randomized Controlled Trials of First-Line ChemotherapyJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2007
- Phase III Study of Capecitabine Plus Oxaliplatin Compared With Fluorouracil and Leucovorin Plus Oxaliplatin in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Final Report of the AIO Colorectal Study GroupJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2007
- Phase III Study of Capecitabine Plus Oxaliplatin Compared With Continuous-Infusion Fluorouracil Plus Oxaliplatin As First-Line Therapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Final Report of the Spanish Cooperative Group for the Treatment of Digestive Tumors TrialJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2007
- Bevacizumab plus Irinotecan, Fluorouracil, and Leucovorin for Metastatic Colorectal CancerThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- A perspective on surrogate endpoints in controlled clinical trialsStatistical Methods in Medical Research, 2004
- Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: Preferred definitions and conceptual frameworkClinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 2001
- Relation between tumour response to first-line chemotherapy and survival in advanced colorectal cancer: a meta-analysisThe Lancet, 2000