Intermediated Quantities and Returns
- 16 February 2009
- preprint
- Published by Elsevier BV in SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract
The difference between average borrowing and lending rates in the United States is over 2 percent. In spite of this large difference, there is over 1.7 times GNP in 2007 of intermediated borrowing and lending between households. In this paper a model is developed consistent with these facts. The only difference within an age cohort is preferences for bequests. Individuals with little or no bequest motive are lenders, while individuals with strong bequest motive are borrowers and owners of productive capital. Given no aggregate uncertainty, the return on equity is the same as the household borrowing rate. The government can borrow at the household lending rate, so there is a 2 percent equity premium in our world with no aggregate uncertainty. We examine the distribution and life cycle patterns of asset holding and consumption and find there is large dispersion in asset holdings and little in consumption.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Quantitative Theory of Unsecured Consumer Credit with Risk of DefaultEconometrica, 2007
- The Saving Rate in Japan: Why it Has Fallen and Why it Will Remain LowSSRN Electronic Journal, 2007
- Junior is rich: bequests as consumptionEconomic Theory, 2006
- Entrepreneurship, Frictions, and WealthJournal of Political Economy, 2006
- Wealth inequality and intergenerational linksThe Review of Economic Studies, 2004
- Accounting for the U.S. Earnings and Wealth InequalityJournal of Political Economy, 2003
- Parental Altruism and Inter Vivos Transfers: Theory and EvidenceJournal of Political Economy, 1997
- Specification of the Joy of Giving: Insights from AltruismThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 1988
- Debt, Deficits, and Finite HorizonsJournal of Political Economy, 1985
- Are Government Bonds Net Wealth?Journal of Political Economy, 1974