Fertility and Childlessness in the United States
- 1 June 2015
- journal article
- Published by American Economic Association in The American Economic Review
- Vol. 105 (6), 1852-1882
- https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20120926
Abstract
We develop a theory of fertility, distinguishing its intensive margin from its extensive margin. The deep parameters are identified using facts from the 1990 US Census: (i) fertility of mothers decreases with education; (ii) childlessness exhibits a U-shaped relationship with education; (iii) the relationship between marriage rates and education is hump-shaped for women and increasing for men. We estimate that 2.5 percent of women were childless because of poverty and 8.1 percent because of high opportunity cost of childrearing. Over time, historical trends in total factor productivity and in education led to a U-shaped response in childlessness rates while fertility of mothers decreased. (JEL I20, J13, J16, N31, N32)Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Fertility Transitions Along the Extensive and Intensive MarginsAmerican Economic Review, 2014
- Maternal health and the baby boomQuantitative Economics, 2014
- A model of voluntary childlessnessJournal of Population Economics, 2012
- Would Empowering Women Initiate the Demographic Transition in Least Developed Countries?Journal of Human Capital, 2010
- The Baby Boom and Baby BustThe American Economic Review, 2005
- Inequality and Growth: Why Differential Fertility MattersAmerican Economic Review, 2003
- More on Marriage, Fertility, and the Distribution of Income*International Economic Review, 2003
- Gender Differences in Education in a Dynamic Household Bargaining ModelInternational Economic Review, 1999
- Simulated Moments Estimation of Markov Models of Asset PricesEconometrica, 1993
- Rational Household Labor SupplyEconometrica, 1988