The Hidden Perils of Citation Counting for Australasian Political Science
- 1 December 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Informa UK Limited in Australian Journal of Political Science
- Vol. 42 (4), 665-678
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10361140701595825
Abstract
In a recent article in Australian Journal of Political Science, Dale and Goldfinch present ‘standard’ journal-based publication and citation rankings of Australasian political science departments designed to complement what they characterise as the multidisciplinary, historical, qualitative and humanistic political science of the region. However, the ‘highly cited’ articles in their top-ranked political science department belong to quantitative psychology. Through unravelling why their study favours the opposite of that which it was meant to detect, this paper alerts political scientists to the hidden perils of accepting ‘standard’ Institute of Scientific Information-based approaches to citation counting as valid measures of research ‘quality’. It exposes the veiled bibliometric assumption that the ‘best’ social science is quantitative research, notes that incongruous citation scores may inform the distribution of block funding and departmental appointment processes, and warns against using ‘standard’ data to unintentionally self-police the future shape of Australasian political science.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Extending citation analysis to non-source itemsScientometrics, 2006
- Article citation rates and productivity of Australasian political science units 1995–2002Australian Journal of Political Science, 2005
- Why are the Most Influential Books in Australian Sociology not Necessarily the Most Highly Cited Ones?Journal of Sociology, 2004
- A Global Ranking of Political Science DepartmentsPolitical Studies Review, 2004
- The difficulty of achieving full coverage of international social science literature and the bibliometric consequencesScientometrics, 1999
- A bibliometric study of reference literature in the sciences and social sciencesInformation Processing & Management, 1999
- Commensuration as a Social ProcessAnnual Review of Sociology, 1998
- Comparative citation rankings of authors in monographic and journal literature: a study of sociologyJournal of Documentation, 1997
- Careers in Print: Books, Journals, and Scholarly ReputationsAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1995
- Sociology of Scientific Knowledge: A Reflexive Citation Analysis or Science Disciplines and Disciplining ScienceSocial Studies of Science, 1991