Dual processing and diagnostic errors
- 11 August 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Advances in Health Sciences Education
- Vol. 14 (S1), 37-49
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-009-9179-x
Abstract
In this paper, I review evidence from two theories in psychology relevant to diagnosis and diagnostic errors. “Dual Process” theories of thinking, frequently mentioned with respect to diagnostic error, propose that categorization decisions can be made with either a fast, unconscious, contextual process called System 1 or a slow, analytical, conscious, and conceptual process, called System 2. Exemplar theories of categorization propose that many category decisions in everyday life are made by unconscious matching to a particular example in memory, and these remain available and retrievable individually. I then review studies of clinical reasoning based on these theories, and show that the two processes are equally effective; System 1, despite its reliance in idiosyncratic, individual experience, is no more prone to cognitive bias or diagnostic error than System 2. Further, I review evidence that instructions directed at encouraging the clinician to explicitly use both strategies can lead to consistent reduction in error rates.Keywords
This publication has 53 references indexed in Scilit:
- Overconfidence as a Cause of Diagnostic Error in MedicineAmerican Journal Of Medicine, 2008
- The benefits of flexibility: the pedagogical value of instructions to adopt multifaceted diagnostic reasoning strategiesMedical Education, 2007
- Critical Thinking and Decisionmaking: Avoiding the Perils of Thin-SlicingAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 2006
- The Effects of Speed on Skilled Chess PerformancePsychological Science, 2004
- Working memory is (almost) perfectly predicted by gIntelligence, 2004
- Diagnostic reasoning strategies and diagnostic successMedical Education, 2003
- The Importance of Cognitive Errors in Diagnosis and Strategies to Minimize ThemAcademic Medicine, 2003
- Cognitive forcing strategies in clinical decisionmakingAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 2003
- Achieving Quality in Clinical Decision Making: Cognitive Strategies and Detection of BiasAcademic Emergency Medicine, 2002
- The Cognitive Imperative Thinking about How We ThinkAcademic Emergency Medicine, 2000