The minimal important difference of the King's Brief Interstitial Lung Disease Questionnaire (K-BILD) and forced vital capacity in interstitial lung disease
- 30 September 2013
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Respiratory Medicine
- Vol. 107 (9), 1438-1443
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmed.2013.06.009
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- The development and validation of the King's Brief Interstitial Lung Disease (K-BILD) health status questionnaireThorax, 2012
- Forced Vital Capacity in Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary FibrosisAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2011
- Development and validity testing of an IPF-specific version of the St George's Respiratory QuestionnaireThorax, 2010
- Development of the ATAQ-IPF: a tool to assess quality of life in IPFHealth and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2010
- Marginal decline in forced vital capacity is associated with a poor outcome in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosisEuropean Respiratory Journal, 2009
- Prognostic Value of Desaturation during a 6-Minute Walk Test in Idiopathic Interstitial PneumoniaAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2003
- American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society International Multidisciplinary Consensus Classification of the Idiopathic Interstitial PneumoniasAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2002
- Assessment of Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Interstitial Lung DiseaseSocial psychiatry. Sozialpsychiatrie. Psychiatrie sociale, 1999
- Standardization of Spirometry, 1994 Update. American Thoracic Society.American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 1995
- Measurement of health status: Ascertaining the minimal clinically important differenceControlled Clinical Trials, 1989