Modeling DIF Effects Using Distractor-Level Invariance Effects: Implications for Understanding the Causes of DIF
- 4 May 2010
- journal article
- other
- Published by SAGE Publications in Applied Psychological Measurement
- Vol. 34 (3), 151-165
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621609359284
Abstract
In 2008, Penfield showed that measurement invariance across all response options of a multiple-choice item (correct option and the J distractors) can be modeled using a nominal response model that included a differential distractor functioning (DDF) effect for each of the J distractors. This article extends this concept to consider how the differential item functioning (DIF) effect (i.e., the conditional between-group differences in the probability of correct response) is determined by the J DDF effects. In particular, this article shows how the DIF effect can be modeled as a function of the J DDF effects and thus reveals the conditions that must hold for uniform DIF, nonuniform DIF, and crossing DIF to exist. The results provide insight into the potential item-level properties that lead to uniform, nonuniform, and crossing DIF. The findings may shed light on the etiology of different forms of DIF, which may help analysts target the particular causes of the DIF effect.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Effects of Referent Item Parameters on Differential Item Functioning Detection Using the Free Baseline Likelihood Ratio TestApplied Psychological Measurement, 2008
- Uniform DIF and DIF Defined by Differences in Item Response FunctionsJournal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 1998
- Variance Estimation for Differential Test Functioning Based on Mantel‐Haenszel StatisticsJournal of Educational Measurement, 1997
- A new procedure for detection of crossing DIFPsychometrika, 1996
- The Standardization Approach to Assessing Comprehensive Differential Item FunctioningJournal of Educational Measurement, 1992
- A Conceptual Analysis of Differential Item Functioning in Terms of a Multidimensional Item Response ModelApplied Psychological Measurement, 1992
- A Didactic Explanation of Item Bias, Item Impact, and Item Validity From a Multidimensional PerspectiveJournal of Educational Measurement, 1992
- A Method for Studying Differential Distractor FunctioningJournal of Educational Measurement, 1989
- DEMONSTRATING THE UTILITY OF THE STANDARDIZATION APPROACH TO ASSESSING UNEXPECTED DIFFERENTIAL ITEM PERFORMANCE ON THE SCHOLASTIC APTITUDE TESTJournal of Educational Measurement, 1986
- Estimating item parameters and latent ability when responses are scored in two or more nominal categoriesPsychometrika, 1972