Transrectal ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging for detection of rectal wall invasion by prostate cancer
- 25 May 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in The Prostate
- Vol. 62 (1), 101-104
- https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.20127
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Total Pelvic Exenteration: Effective Palliation of Perineal Pain in Patients With Locally Recurrent Prostate CancerJournal of Urology, 2003
- Comparison of Transrectal Sonography and Double-Contrast MR Imaging When Staging Rectal CancerAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2003
- Total Cystoprostatectomy in the Treatment of Locally Advanced Prostate CarcinomaAktuelle Urologie, 2003
- Clinical utility of endorectal MRI in determining PSA outcome for patients with biopsy Gleason score 7, PSA ≤10, and clinically localized prostate cancerInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 2003
- Endorectal Color Doppler Sonography and Endorectal MR Imaging Features of Nonpalpable Prostate CancerAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2000
- Natural History of Progression After PSA Elevation Following Radical ProstatectomyJama-Journal Of The American Medical Association, 1999
- Endo-Rectal Coil Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: Is it Accurate?Journal of Urology, 1996
- Staging Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging versus Transrectal Ultrasound in Stages A and B Prostatic CancerUrologia Internationalis, 1994
- NATURAL HISTORY OF LOCALISED PROSTATIC CANCER MANAGED BY CONSERVATIVE THERAPY ALONEThe Lancet, 1988
- THE USE OF CONFIDENCE OR FIDUCIAL LIMITS ILLUSTRATED IN THE CASE OF THE BINOMIALBiometrika, 1934