Recruiting and retaining participants in e-Delphi surveys for core outcome set development: Evaluating the COMiT'ID study
Open Access
- 30 July 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 13 (7), e0201378
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201378
Abstract
Background A Core Outcome Set (COS) is an agreed list of outcomes that are measured and reported in all clinical trials for a particular health condition. An 'e-Delphi' is an increasingly popular method for developing a COS whereby stakeholders are consulted via a multi-round online survey to reach agreement regarding the most important outcomes. Many COS studies seek diverse, international input that includes professionals and healthcare users. However, the recruitment and retention of participants can be deterred by various factors (e.g. language barriers and iterative, time-consuming rounds). This report evaluates the effectiveness of recruitment and retention methods used in the Core Outcome Measures in Tinnitus International Delphi (COMiT'ID) study using participant feedback from healthcare users, healthcare practitioners, researchers, commercial representatives and funders. Methods A range of methods were applied to recruit participants to the study and maintain engagement over the three rounds. Feedback on recruitment and retention methods was collected using a twenty-item online questionnaire, with free text comments. Results A personalised email invitation was the most frequent recruitment route, and 719 professionals and healthcare users consented to take part. Retention of each stakeholder group ranged from 76 to 91% completing all three e-Delphi rounds. Feedback was given by 379 respondents. A majority of respondents were satisfied with the study methods that were implemented to promote retention. Over 55% indicated that their overall experience closely matched their expectations at the start of the study, and over 90% felt that their contribution was appreciated. Conclusions This report highlights study methods that worked well with respect to recruitment and retention, and those that did not. Findings provide a unique contribution to the growing evidence base of good practice in COS development by demonstrating the relative effectiveness of recruitment and retention methods for an e-Delphi survey.Keywords
Funding Information
- British Tinnitus Association
- National Institute for Health Research
- Action on Hearing Loss
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Core outcome domains for clinical trials in non-specific low back painEuropean Spine Journal, 2015
- Developing core outcome set for vitiligo clinical trials: international e‐Delphi consensusPigment Cell & Melanoma Research, 2015
- A core outcome set for clinical trials in acute diarrhoeaArchives of Disease in Childhood, 2014
- Internet-Based Delphi Research: Case Based DiscussionEnvironmental Management, 2013
- Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to considerTrials, 2012
- Can user testing of a clinical trial patient information sheet make it fit-for-purpose? - a randomized controlled trialBMC Medicine, 2011
- Using the Delphi Technique to Determine Which Outcomes to Measure in Clinical Trials: Recommendations for the Future Based on a Systematic Review of Existing StudiesPLoS Medicine, 2010
- Moving best practice forward: Delphi characteristics, advantages, potential problems, and solutionsInternational Journal of Tourism Research, 2008
- A Proposal for Case Definitions and Outcome Measures in Studies of Infantile Spasms and West Syndrome: Consensus Statement of the West Delphi GroupEpilepsia, 2004
- Preliminary core sets of measures for disease activity and damage assessment in juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus and juvenile dermatomyositisRheumatology, 2003