Effects of Two Different Eight-Week Training Programs on Military Physical Performance
- 1 March 2008
- journal article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research
- Vol. 22 (2), 524-534
- https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0b013e31816347b6
Abstract
Various physical demands are placed on soldiers, whose effectiveness and survivability depend on their combat-specific physical fitness. Because sport training programs involving weight-based training have proven effective, this study examined the value of such a program for short-term military training using combat-relevant tests. A male weight-based training (WBT) group (n = 15; mean +/- SD: 27.0 +/- 4.7 years, 173.8 +/- 5.8 cm, 80.9 +/- 12.7 kg) performed full-body weight-based training workouts, 3.2-km runs, interval training, agility training, and progressively loaded 8-km backpack hikes. A male Army Standardized Physical Training (SPT) group (n = 17; mean +/- SD: 29.0 +/- 4.6 years, 179.7 +/- 8.2 cm, 84.5 +/- 10.4 kg) followed the new Army Standardized Physical Training program of stretching, varied calisthenics, movement drills, sprint intervals, shuttle running, and distance runs. Both groups exercised for 1.5 hours a day, 5 days a week for 8 weeks. The following training-induced changes were statistically significant (P < 0.05) for both training groups: 3.2-km run or walk with 32-kg load (minutes), 24.5 +/- 3.2 to 21.0 +/- 2.8 (SPT) and 24.9 +/- 2.8 to 21.1 +/- 2.2 (WBT); 400-m run with 18-kg load (seconds), 94.5 +/- 14.2 to 84.4 +/- 11.9 (SPT) and 100.1 +/- 16.1 to 84.0 +/- 8.4 (WBT); obstacle course with 18-kg load (seconds), 73.3 +/- 10.1 to 61.6 +/- 7.7 (SPT) and 66.8 +/- 10.0 to 60.1 +/- 8.7 (WBT); 5 30-m sprints to prone (seconds), 63.5 +/- 4.8 to 59.8 +/- 4.1 (SPT) and 60.4 +/- 4.2 to 58.9 +/- 2.7 (WBT); and 80-kg casualty rescue from 50 m (seconds), 65.8 +/- 40.0 to 42.1 +/- 9.9 (SPT) and 57.6 +/- 22.0 to 44.2 +/- 8.8 (WBT). Of these tests, only the obstacle course showed significant difference in improvement between the two training groups. Thus, for short-term (i.e., 8-week) training of relatively untrained men, the Army's new Standardized Physical Training program and a weight-based training experimental program can produce similar, significant, and meaningful improvements in military physical performance. Further research would be needed to determine whether weight-based training provides an advantage over a longer training period.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Training for Endurance and StrengthMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2006
- Concurrent Strength and Endurance TrainingMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2006
- Can Simple Anthropometric and Physical Performance Tests Track Training-Induced Changes in Load-Carriage Ability?Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,2006
- Effects of Concurrent Resistance and Aerobic Training on Load-Bearing Performance and the Army Physical Fitness TestPublished by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,2004
- Reliability Assessment of Two Militarily Relevant Occupational Physical Performance TestsCanadian Journal of Applied Physiology, 2003
- Risk factors for training-related injuries among men and women in basic combat trainingMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2001
- Effect of resistance training on women???s strength/power and occupational performancesMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2001
- Weight Training of the Thigh Muscles Using Closed Versus Open Kinetic Chain Exercises: A Comparison of Performance EnhancementJournal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 1998
- Changes in ??VO2max and maximal treadmill time after 9 wk of running or in-line skate trainingMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 1996
- An analysis of aerobic capacity in a large United States populationJournal of Applied Physiology, 1986