Sensitivity and Specificity of Perfusion Scintigraphy Combined with Chest Radiography for Acute Pulmonary Embolism in PIOPED II
- 16 October 2008
- journal article
- Published by Society of Nuclear Medicine in Materials
- Vol. 49 (11), 1741-1748
- https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.108.052217
Abstract
We used the archived Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis II (PIOPED II) data and images to test the hypothesis that reading perfusion scans with chest radiographs but without ventilation scans, and categorizing the perfusion scan as "pulmonary embolism (PE) present" or "PE absent," can result in clinically useful sensitivity and specificity in most patients. Patients recruited into PIOPED II were eligible for the present study if they had a CT angiography (CTA) or digital subtraction angiography (DSA) diagnosis, an interpretable perfusion scan and chest radiographs, and a Wells' score. Four readers reinterpreted the perfusion scans and chest radiographs of eligible patients. Two readers used the modified PIOPED II criteria and 2 used the Prospective Investigative Study of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis (PISAPED) criteria. The chest radiographs were read as "normal/near normal," "abnormal," or "nondiagnostic," and the perfusion scans were read as "PE present," "PE absent," or "nondiagnostic." The primary analysis used a composite reference standard: the PIOPED II DSA result or, if there was no definitive DSA result, CTA results that were concordant with the Wells' score as defined in PIOPED II (CTA positive and Wells' score > 2, or CTA negative and Wells' score < 6). The prevalence of PE in the sample was 169 of 889 (19%). Using the modified PIOPED II criteria, the sensitivity of a "PE present" perfusion scan was 84.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 80.1%-88.8%), and the specificity of "PE absent" was 92.7% (95% CI, 91.1%-94.1%), excluding "nondiagnostic" results, which occurred in 20.6% (95% CI, 18.8%-22.5%). Using PISAPED criteria, the sensitivity of a "PE present" perfusion scan was 80.4% (95% CI, 75.9%-84.3%) and the specificity of "PE absent" was 96.6% (95% CI, 95.5%-97.4%), whereas the proportion of patients with "nondiagnostic" scans was 0% (95% CI, 0.0%-0.2%). Perfusion scintigraphy combined with chest radiography can provide diagnostic accuracy similar to both CTA and ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy, at lower cost and with lower radiation dose. With modified PIOPED II criteria, a higher proportion of scans were nondiagnostic than with CTA, and with PISAPED criteria none were nondiagnostic.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Sensitivity and Specificity of Ventilation-Perfusion Scintigraphy in PIOPED II StudyRadiology, 2008
- Computed Tomography — An Increasing Source of Radiation ExposureNew England Journal of Medicine, 2007
- Very Low Probability Interpretation of V/Q Lung Scans in Combination with Low Probability Objective Clinical Assessment Reliably Excludes Pulmonary Embolism: Data from PIOPED IIJournal of Nuclear Medicine, 2007
- Diagnostic Pathways in Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Recommendations of The PIOPED II InvestigatorsAmerican Journal Of Medicine, 2006
- Trends in the use of diagnostic imaging in patients hospitalized with acute pulmonary embolismThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2004
- Pulmonary embolism: prediction of the usefulness of initial ventilation-perfusion scanning with chest radiographic findings.Radiology, 1994
- Evaluation of revised criteria for ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.Radiology, 1994
- Value of the Ventilation/Perfusion Scan in Acute Pulmonary EmbolismJama-Journal Of The American Medical Association, 1990
- Clinical Validity of a Normal Perfusion Lung Scan in Patients with Suspected Pulmonary EmbolismChest, 1990
- Longterm Follow-Up of Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Embolism and a Normal Lung ScanChest, 1982