Facilitating donor compliance with strategies to prevent vasovagal reactions: comparison of web‐based and in‐center approaches
- 21 August 2017
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Transfusion
- Vol. 57 (10), 2449-2457
- https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.14243
Abstract
Research has documented beneficial effects of water loading (WL) and applied muscle tension (AMT) on reducing self-reported vasovagal reactions (VVRs) in whole blood (WB) donors. However, the optimal approach to reducing VVRs using these strategies in routine blood collection practice is not known. This study evaluated the effectiveness of embedding newly developed web-based and on-site donor education materials to increase the use of these two prevention techniques during blood collection. Two studies were conducted with WB donors. In Study 1, donors (n = 375) were randomly allocated to evaluate one of three forms of educational materials (video, webpage, card) in an online questionnaire. In Study 2, donors (n = 598) were randomly assigned to view either off-site web-based or in-center educational materials and were surveyed after donation to assess compliance to the VVR prevention procedure and to self-report VVR. In Study 1, donors rated the video as having the highest message appeal and indicated greater likelihood to use AMT compared to the webpage and card. No differences were found in likelihood to use WL. In contrast, in Study 2, greater adherence to VVR prevention strategies was observed in donors who received the in-center instruction card in comparison to those who received the web-based materials. Examination of viewing data indicated that only a small number of donors had seen the web-based materials. No significant effects of the techniques were found on self-reported VVRs. Providing on-site instructions is the most effective method to increase donor compliance to VVR prevention techniques.Keywords
Funding Information
- The Australian Government
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prevention of syncopal‐type reactions after whole blood donation: a cluster‐randomized trial assessing hydration and muscle tension exerciseTransfusion, 2016
- The effects of leg crossing and applied tension on blood donor returnVox Sanguinis, 2013
- Adverse reactions and other factors that impact subsequent blood donation visitsTransfusion, 2011
- Symptoms and signs of syncope: a review of the link between physiology and clinical cluesBrain, 2009
- Dismantling applied tension: mechanisms of a treatment to reduce blood donation–related symptomsTransfusion, 2007
- The effect of a 473‐mL (16‐oz) water drink on vasovagal donor reaction rates in high‐school studentsTransfusion, 2007
- Donors who react may not come back: Analysis of repeat donation as a function of phlebotomist ratings of vasovagal reactionsTransfusion and Apheresis Science, 2005
- Predonation water ingestion attenuates negative reactions to blood donationTransfusion, 2004
- Reducing reactions to blood donation with applied muscle tension: a randomized controlled trialTransfusion, 2003
- Retention of “safe” blood donors. The Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor StudyTransfusion, 1998