Prediction of Poor Outcome in Patients with Acute Liver Failure—Systematic Review of Prediction Models
Open Access
- 14 December 2012
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 7 (12), e50952
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050952
Abstract
Acute liver failure is a rare disease with high mortality and liver transplantation is the only life saving therapy. Accurate prognosis of ALF is crucial for proper intervention. To identify and characterize newly developed prognostic models of mortality for ALF patients, assess study quality, identify important variables and provide recommendations for the development of improved models in the future. The online databases MEDLINE® (1950–2012) and EMBASE® (1980–2012) were searched for English-language articles that reported original data from clinical trials or observational studies on prognostic models in ALF patients. Studies were included if they developed a new model or modified existing prognostic models. The studies were evaluated based on an existing framework for scoring the methodological and reporting quality of prognostic models. Twenty studies were included, of which 18 reported on newly developed models, 1 on modification of the Kings College Criteria (KCC) and 1 on the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD). Ten studies compared the newly developed models to previously existing models (e.g. KCC); they all reported that the new models were superior. In the 12-point methodological quality score, only one study scored full points. On the 38-point reporting score, no study scored full points. There was a general lack of reporting on missing values. In addition, none of the studies used performance measures for calibration and accuracy (e.g. Hosmer-Lemeshow statistics, Brier score), and only 5 studies used the AUC as a measure of discrimination. There are many studies on prognostic models for ALF but they show methodological and reporting limitations. Future studies could be improved by better reporting and handling of missing data, the inclusion of model calibration aspects, use of absolute risk measures, explicit considerations for variable selection, the use of a more extensive set of reference models and more thorough validation.Keywords
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- Systematic review: acute liver failure – one disease, more than 40 definitionsAlimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 2012
- Prediction of Mortality in Very Premature Infants: A Systematic Review of Prediction ModelsPLOS ONE, 2011
- Prediction models in reproductive medicine: a critical appraisal†Human Reproduction Update, 2009
- A new prognostic formula for adult acute liver failure using computer tomography-derived hepatic volumetric analysisThe Esophagus, 2009
- Fulminant hepatitis A virus infection in the United States: Incidence, prognosis, and outcomesHepatology, 2006
- Biochemical prognostic markers of outcome in non-paracetamol???induced fulminant hepatic failureTransplantation, 2004
- Longitudinal Modeling with Randomly and Systematically Missing Data: A Simulation of Ad Hoc, Maximum Likelihood, and Multiple Imputation TechniquesOrganizational Research Methods, 2003
- A model to predict survival in patients with end-stage liver diseaseHepatology, 2001
- Early indicators of prognosis in fulmitant hepatic failure: an assessment of the King's criteriaJournal of Hepatology, 1997
- Emergency liver transplantation for acute liver failure: Evaluation of London and Clichy criteriaJournal of Hepatology, 1993