The Judgment of Paris According to Borda
- 1 November 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in Journal of Wine Research
- Vol. 20 (3), 171-182
- https://doi.org/10.1080/09571260903451029
Abstract
We use the Borda Count, the only non-dictatorial positional voting method that satisfies the criteria for a rational decision procedure while using the complete information provided in the ranking of each voter, to determine the outcome of the 1976 Judgment of Paris tastings. The surprising result is that a French wine, Château Haut-Brion 1970, is the Borda winner of the red wine competition and not the Stag's Leap Wine Cellars Cabernet Sauvignon 1973 from California as announced. The declared winner of the Chardonnay competition, Chateau Montelena Chardonnay 1973, a California wine, is also the Borda winner.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Disposing Dictators, Demystifying Voting ParadoxesPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,2008
- Analysis of a Wine TastingJournal of Wine Economics, 2006
- The Paris 1976 Wine Tastings Revisited Once More: Comparing Ratings of Consistent and Inconsistent TastersJournal of Wine Economics, 2006
- Who won the 1976 blind tasting of French Bordeaux and US Cabernets? Parametrics to the rescueJournal of Wine Research, 2004
- Are partwise comparisons reliable?Research in Engineering Design, 2004
- Decisions and ElectionsPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,2001
- Mathematical structure of voting paradoxesEconomic Theory, 2000
- Analyzing a Wine Tasting StatisticallyCHANCE, 1999