User perspectives on relevance criteria: A comparison among relevant, partially relevant, and not‐relevant judgments
- 28 January 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
- Vol. 53 (5), 327-342
- https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10049
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Towards the identification of the optimal number of relevance categoriesJournal of the American Society for Information Science, 1999
- USERS' PARTIAL RELEVANCE JUDGEMENTS DURING ONLINE SEARCHINGOnline and CD-Rom Review, 1997
- Subjective versus Objective Relevance in Bibliographic Retrieval SystemsThe Library Quarterly, 1986
- OUTLINE OF A GENERAL PROBABILISTIC RETRIEVAL MODELJournal of Documentation, 1983
- Catalog information and text as indicators of relevanceJournal of the American Society for Information Science, 1978
- Situational relevanceInformation Storage and Retrieval, 1973
- The functions of abstracts in the initial screening of technical documents by the userJournal of the American Society for Information Science, 1973
- A note on the concept of “relevance”Information Storage and Retrieval, 1972
- A definition of relevance for information retrievalInformation Storage and Retrieval, 1971
- A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal ScalesEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1960