Pulmonary-Artery versus Central Venous Catheter to Guide Treatment of Acute Lung Injury
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 25 May 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in The New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 354 (21), 2213-2224
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa061895
Abstract
The balance between the benefits and the risks of pulmonary-artery catheters (PACs) has not been established.Keywords
This publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- Ventilation with Lower Tidal Volumes as Compared with Traditional Tidal Volumes for Acute Lung Injury and the Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2000
- Intensive care physicians' insufficient knowledge of right-heart catheterization at the bedsideCritical Care Medicine, 1997
- The effectiveness of right heart catheterization in the initial care of critically ill patients. SUPPORT InvestigatorsJAMA, 1996
- Pulmonary artery catheterization in critically ill patientsCritical Care Medicine, 1994
- Evaluation of right heart catheterization in critically ill patients ONTARIO INTENSIVE CARE STUDY GROUPCritical Care Medicine, 1992
- A multicenter study of physicians' knowledge of the pulmonary artery catheter. Pulmonary Artery Catheter Study GroupJAMA, 1990
- The Role of Physiologic Monitoring in Patients with Fractures of the HipThe Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 1985
- Clinical evaluation compared to pulmonary artery catheterization in the hemodynamic assessment of critically ill patientsCritical Care Medicine, 1984
- Evaluation of Right-Heart Catheterization in the Critically Ill Patient without Acute Myocardial InfarctionThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1983
- Flow Directed-Pulmonary Artery Catheterization in Surgical PatientsAnnals of Surgery, 1972