Detection of intracavitary uterine pathology using offline analysis of three‐dimensional ultrasound volumes: interobserver agreement and diagnostic accuracy
- 5 September 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Vol. 40 (4), 459-463
- https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.11163
Abstract
Objective To estimate the diagnostic accuracy and interobserver agreement in predicting intracavitary uterine pathology at offline analysis of three‐dimensional (3D) ultrasound volumes of the uterus. Methods 3D volumes (unenhanced ultrasound and gel infusion sonography with and without power Doppler, i.e. four volumes per patient) of 75 women presenting with abnormal uterine bleeding at a ‘bleeding clinic’ were assessed offline by six examiners. The sonologists were asked to provide a tentative diagnosis. A histological diagnosis was obtained by hysteroscopy with biopsy or operative hysteroscopy. Proliferative, secretory or atrophic endometrium was classified as ‘normal’ histology; endometrial polyps, intracavitary myomas, endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial cancer were classified as ‘abnormal’ histology. The diagnostic accuracy of the six sonologists with regard to normal/abnormal histology and interobserver agreement were estimated. Results Intracavitary pathology was diagnosed at histology in 39% of patients. Agreement between the ultrasound diagnosis and the histological diagnosis (normal vs abnormal) ranged from 67 to 83% for the six sonologists. In 45% of cases all six examiners agreed with regard to the presence/absence of intracavitary pathology. The percentage agreement between any two examiners ranged from 65 to 91% (Cohen's κ, 0.31–0.81). The Schouten κ for all six examiners was 0.51 (95% CI, 0.40–0.62), while the highest Schouten κ for any three examiners was 0.69. Conclusion When analyzing stored 3D ultrasound volumes, agreement between sonologists with regard to classifying the endometrium/uterine cavity as normal or abnormal as well as the diagnostic accuracy varied substantially. Possible actions to improve interobserver agreement and diagnostic accuracy include optimization of image quality and the use of a consistent technique for analyzing the 3D volumes. Copyright © 2012 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Interobserver variability in assessment of cranial ultrasound in very preterm infantsJournal of Neuroradiology, 2011
- Effect of Recommendations on Interobserver Consistency of Diastolic Function EvaluationJACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, 2011
- Intra‐ and interobserver variability of 2D and 3D transvaginal sonography in the diagnosis of benign versus malignant adnexal massesJournal of Clinical Ultrasound, 2011
- Predicting the risk of endometrial cancer in postmenopausal women presenting with vaginal bleeding: the Norwich DEFAB risk assessment toolBritish Journal of Cancer, 2010
- Terms, definitions and measurements to describe the sonographic features of the endometrium and intrauterine lesions: a consensus opinion from the International Endometrial Tumor Analysis (IETA) groupUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2009
- Dynamic and interactive gynecological ultrasound examinationUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2009
- Two‐ and three‐dimensional saline contrast sonohysterography: interobserver agreement, agreement with hysteroscopy and diagnosis of endometrial malignancyUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2009
- Diagnostic accuracy of endometrial thickness to exclude polyps in women with postmenopausal bleedingJournal of Clinical Ultrasound, 2007
- Saline contrast hysterosonography in abnormal uterine bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysisBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2003
- A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal ScalesEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1960