The women are not wrong: It is the approach that is debatable*
- 1 February 2009
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Criminology & Public Policy
- Vol. 8 (1), 221-229
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9133.2009.00548.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Gender and Risk AssessmentJournal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 2007
- Response to Commentary: Cross-Examining Risk “Knowledge”Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 2007
- Assessing Recidivism Risk Across Female Pathways to CrimeJustice Quarterly, 2006
- PANDORA'S BOX: RISK/NEED AND GENDER‐RESPONSIVE CORRECTIONSCriminology & Public Policy, 2006
- The Assessment and Treatment of Women OffendersPublished by Wiley ,2006
- Gender Differences in Life-Course Theory of Recidivism: A Survival AnalysisInternational Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 2005
- V. Gendering Risk at What Cost: Negotiations of Gender and Risk in Canadian Women’s PrisonsFeminism & Psychology, 2004
- POVERTY, STATE CAPITAL, AND RECIDIVISM AMONG WOMEN OFFENDERS*Criminology & Public Policy, 2004
- Ethnicity, gender, and the Level of Service Inventory-RevisedJournal of Criminal Justice, 2003
- Recidivism of Prisoners Released in 1994Federal Sentencing Reporter, 2002