The importance of nomenclature for congenital cardiac disease: implications for research and evaluation
Open Access
- 1 April 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Cardiology in the Young
- Vol. 18 (S2), 92-100
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s1047951108002515
Abstract
Background Administrative databases are often used for congenital cardiac disease research and evaluation, with little validation of the accuracy of the diagnostic codes. Methods Metropolitan Atlanta Congenital Defects Program surveillance records were reviewed and classified using a version of the International Pediatric and Congenital Cardiac Code. Using this clinical nomenclature as the referent, we report the sensitivity and false positive fraction (1 – positive predictive value) of the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis codes for tetralogy of Fallot, transposition of the great arteries, and hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Results We identified 4918 infants and foetuses with congenital cardiac disease from the surveillance records. Using only the International Classification of Diseases diagnosis codes, there were 280 records with tetralogy, 317 records with transposition, and 192 records with hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Based on the International Pediatric and Congenital Cardiac Code, 330 records were classified as tetralogy, 163 records as transposition, and 179 records as hypoplastic left heart syndrome. The sensitivity of International Classification of Diseases diagnosis codes was 83% for tetralogy, 100% for transposition, and 95% for hypoplastic left heart syndrome. The false positive fraction was 2% for tetralogy, 49% for transposition, and 11% for hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Conclusions Analyses based on International Classification of Diseases diagnosis codes may have substantial misclassification of congenital heart disease. Isolating the major defect is difficult, and certain codes do not differentiate between variants that are clinically and developmentally different.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Analysis of outcomes for congenital cardiac disease: can we do better?Cardiology in the Young, 2007
- The nomenclature, definition and classification of cardiac structures in the setting of heterotaxyCardiology in the Young, 2007
- Changes in Hospitalization Patterns Among Patients With Congenital Heart Disease During the Transition From Adolescence to AdulthoodJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2007
- Contents & welcoming letterBirth Defects Research Part A: Clinical and Molecular Teratology, 2007
- Heterotaxy Syndrome with Functional Single Ventricle: Does Prenatal Diagnosis Improve Survival?The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2006
- Risk factors for deaths occurring within 30 days and 1 year after hospital discharge for cardiac surgery among pediatric patientsAmerican Heart Journal, 2006
- In-Hospital Mortality for Children With Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome After Stage I Surgical Palliation: Teaching Versus Nonteaching HospitalsPEDIATRICS, 2006
- Classification of the functionally univentricular heart: unity from mapped codesCardiology in the Young, 2006
- Initial Application in The STS Congenital Database of Complexity Adjustment to Evaluate Surgical Case Mix and ResultsThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2005
- Completeness of state administrative databases for surveillance of congenital heart diseaseBirth Defects Research Part A: Clinical and Molecular Teratology, 2003