Research community needs to better appreciate the value of sex-based research
Open Access
- 8 April 2019
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
- Vol. 116 (15), 7154-7156
- https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1903586116
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluating sex as a biological variable in preclinical research: the devil in the detailsBiology of Sex Differences, 2016
- Mind the Gap: Sex Bias in Basic Skin ResearchJournal of Investigative Dermatology, 2016
- Studying both sexes: a guiding principle for biomedicineThe FASEB Journal, 2015
- Twenty years and still counting: including women as participants and studying sex and gender in biomedical researchBMC Women's Health, 2015
- Sex inclusion in basic research drives discoveryProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015
- Sex bias exists in basic science and translational surgical researchSurgery, 2014
- Sex, equity, and scienceProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014
- Enrollment and Monitoring of Women in Post-Approval Studies for Medical Devices Mandated by the Food and Drug AdministrationJournal of Women's Health, 2014
- Sex bias in neuroscience and biomedical researchNeuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 2011
- Sex bias in trials and treatment must endNature, 2010