Axospinous synaptic subtype‐specific differences in structure, size, ionotropic receptor expression, and connectivity in apical dendritic regions of rat hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons
- 12 November 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Comparative Neurology
- Vol. 512 (3), 399-418
- https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.21896
Abstract
The morphology of axospinous synapses and their parent spines varies widely. Additionally, many of these synapses are contacted by multiple synapse boutons (MSBs) and show substantial variability in receptor expression. The two major axospinous synaptic subtypes are perforated and nonperforated, but there are several subcategories within these two classes. The present study used serial section electron microscopy to determine whether perforated and nonperforated synaptic subtypes differed with regard to their distribution, size, receptor expression, and connectivity to MSBs in three apical dendritic regions of rat hippocampal area CA1: the proximal and distal thirds of stratum radiatum, and the stratum lacunosum‐moleculare. All synaptic subtypes were present throughout the apical dendritic regions, but there were several subclass‐specific differences. First, segmented, completely partitioned synapses changed in number, proportion, and α‐amino‐3‐hydroxy‐5‐methyl‐4‐isoxazolepropionate (AMPA) receptor expression with distance from the soma beyond that found within other perforated synaptic subtypes. Second, atypically large, nonperforated synapses showed N‐methyl‐D‐aspartate (NMDA) receptor immunoreactivity identical to that of perforated synapses, levels of AMPA receptor expression intermediate to that of nonperforated and perforated synapses, and perforated synapse‐like changes in structure with distance from the soma. Finally, MSB connectivity was highest in the proximal stratum radiatum, but only for those MSBs composed of nonperforated synapses. The immunogold data suggest that most MSBs would not generate simultaneous depolarizations in multiple neurons or spines, however, because the vast majority of MSBs are comprised of two synapses with abnormally low levels of receptor expression, or involve one synapse with a high level of receptor expression and another with only a low level. J. Comp. Neurol. 512:399–418, 2009.Keywords
This publication has 109 references indexed in Scilit:
- Balancing Structure and Function at Hippocampal Dendritic SpinesAnnual Review of Neuroscience, 2008
- Do thin spines learn to be mushroom spines that remember?Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 2007
- Rapid Redistribution of Synaptic PSD-95 in the Neocortex In VivoPLoS Biology, 2006
- Integration of biochemical signalling in spinesNature Reviews Neuroscience, 2005
- Spine-Neck Geometry Determines NMDA Receptor-Dependent Ca2+ Signaling in DendritesNeuron, 2005
- Induction of Multiple Synapses by Experience in the Visual Cortex of Adult RatsNeurobiology of Learning and Memory, 1997
- Dimensions and density of dendritic spines from rat dentate granule cells based on reconstructions from serial electron micrographsJournal of Comparative Neurology, 1997
- An Analysis of Contemporary Morphological Concepts of Synaptic Remodelling in the CNS: Perforated Synapses RevisitedProgress in Neurobiology, 1995
- Synaptic remodelling during development and maturation: Junction differentiation and splitting as a mechanism for modifying connectivityDevelopmental Brain Research, 1984
- Electron Microscopy of Synaptic Contacts on Dendrite Spines of the Cerebral CortexNature, 1959