Comparison of Sociodemographic and Health-Related Characteristics of UK Biobank Participants With Those of the General Population
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 21 June 2017
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in American Journal of Epidemiology
- Vol. 186 (9), 1026-1034
- https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwx246
Abstract
The UK Biobank cohort is a population-based cohort of 500,000 participants recruited in the United Kingdom (UK) between 2006 and 2010. Approximately 9.2 million individuals aged 40–69 years who lived within 25 miles (40 km) of one of 22 assessment centers in England, Wales, and Scotland were invited to enter the cohort, and 5.5% participated in the baseline assessment. The representativeness of the UK Biobank cohort was investigated by comparing demographic characteristics between nonresponders and responders. Sociodemographic, physical, lifestyle, and health-related characteristics of the cohort were compared with nationally representative data sources. UK Biobank participants were more likely to be older, to be female, and to live in less socioeconomically deprived areas than nonparticipants. Compared with the general population, participants were less likely to be obese, to smoke, and to drink alcohol on a daily basis and had fewer self-reported health conditions. At age 70–74 years, rates of all-cause mortality and total cancer incidence were 46.2% and 11.8% lower, respectively, in men and 55.5% and 18.1% lower, respectively, in women than in the general population of the same age. UK Biobank is not representative of the sampling population; there is evidence of a “healthy volunteer” selection bias. Nonetheless, valid assessment of exposure-disease relationships may be widely generalizable and does not require participants to be representative of the population at large.Keywords
Funding Information
- Wellcome Trust
- Medical Research Council
- United Kingdom Department of Health
- Scottish Government
- Welsh Assembly Government
- British Heart Foundation
- Diabetes UK
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of the sociodemographic characteristics of the large NutriNet-Santé e-cohort with French Census data: the issue of volunteer bias revisitedJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2015
- UK Biobank: An Open Access Resource for Identifying the Causes of a Wide Range of Complex Diseases of Middle and Old AgePLoS Medicine, 2015
- Recruitment via the Internet and Social Networking Sites: The 1989-1995 Cohort of the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s HealthJournal of Medical Internet Research, 2014
- Mortality and cancer incidence in the EPIC-NL cohort: impact of the healthy volunteer effectEuropean Journal of Public Health, 2014
- New Models for Large Prospective Studies: Is There a Better Way?American Journal of Epidemiology, 2012
- Cohort Profile: The Health Survey for EnglandInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 2012
- Representativeness of participants in a cross-sectional health survey by time of day and day of week of data collectionEuropean Journal of Public Health, 2011
- Evidence of a Healthy Volunteer Effect in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening TrialAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2007
- BiasJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2004
- Low all-cause mortality in the volunteer-based Rotterdam section of the European randomised study of screening for prostate cancer: self-selection bias?Journal of Medical Screening, 2004