Dosage Considerations for Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Children: A Computational Modeling Study
Open Access
- 27 September 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 8 (9), e76112
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0076112
Abstract
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is being widely investigated in adults as a therapeutic modality for brain disorders involving abnormal cortical excitability or disordered network activity. Interest is also growing in studying tDCS in children. Limited empirical studies in children suggest that tDCS is well tolerated and may have a similar safety profile as in adults. However, in electrotherapy as in pharmacotherapy, dose selection in children requires special attention, and simple extrapolation from adult studies may be inadequate. Critical aspects of dose adjustment include 1) differences in neurophysiology and disease, and 2) variation in brain electric fields for a specified dose due to gross anatomical differences between children and adults. In this study, we used high-resolution MRI derived finite element modeling simulations of two healthy children, ages 8 years and 12 years, and three healthy adults with varying head size to compare differences in electric field intensity and distribution. Multiple conventional and high-definition tDCS montages were tested. Our results suggest that on average, children will be exposed to higher peak electrical fields for a given applied current intensity than adults, but there is likely to be overlap between adults with smaller head size and children. In addition, exposure is montage specific. Variations in peak electrical fields were seen between the two pediatric models, despite comparable head size, suggesting that the relationship between neuroanatomic factors and bioavailable current dose is not trivial. In conclusion, caution is advised in using higher tDCS doses in children until 1) further modeling studies in a larger group shed light on the range of exposure possible by applied dose and age and 2) further studies correlate bioavailable dose estimates from modeling studies with empirically tested physiologic effects, such as modulation of motor evoked potentials after stimulation.This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- Differences in the experience of active and sham transcranial direct current stimulationBrain Stimulation, 2012
- Contribution of axonal orientation to pathway-dependent modulation of excitatory transmission by direct current stimulation in isolated rat hippocampusJournal of Neurophysiology, 2012
- Finite-Element Model Predicts Current Density Distribution for Clinical Applications of tDCS and tACSFrontiers in Psychiatry, 2012
- A finite element analysis of the effect of electrode area and inter-electrode distance on the spatial distribution of the current density in tDCSJournal of Neural Engineering, 2011
- Tolerability of transcranial direct current stimulation in childhood-onset schizophreniaBrain Stimulation, 2011
- The Developmental Trajectory of Brain-Scalp Distance from Birth through Childhood: Implications for Functional NeuroimagingPLOS ONE, 2011
- Total and Regional Brain Volumes in a Population-Based Normative Sample from 4 to 18 Years: The NIH MRI Study of Normal Brain DevelopmentCerebral Cortex, 2011
- Transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with skull defects and skull plates: High-resolution computational FEM study of factors altering cortical current flowNeuroImage, 2010
- What is the right dose for children?British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2010
- Gyri-precise head model of transcranial direct current stimulation: Improved spatial focality using a ring electrode versus conventional rectangular padBrain Stimulation, 2009