Evaluating Internet and Scholarly Sources Across the Disciplines: Two Case Studies
- 1 September 2007
- journal article
- Published by Informa UK Limited in College Teaching
- Vol. 55 (4)
- https://doi.org/10.3200/ctch.55.4.151-156
Abstract
Although most college faculty expect their students to analyze Internet and scholarly sources in a critical and responsible manner, recent research suggests that many undergraduates are unable to discriminate between credible and noncredible sources, in part because they lack the proper training and relevant experiences. The authors describe two case studies from different disciplines (psychology and history) that offer a variety of strategies instructors can use to help students learn to critically evaluate and analyze Internet and scholarly sources.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluating web-sources: Internet literacy and L2 academic writingELT Journal, 2005
- Calling Off the Hounds: Technology and the Visibility of PlagiarismPedagogy, 2005
- Plagiarism and Technology: A Tool for Coping With PlagiarismJournal of Education for Business, 2005
- Student Online Plagiarism: How Do We Respond?College Teaching, 2003
- Effect of the Web on Undergraduate Citation Behavior: Guiding Student Scholarship in a Networked Ageportal: Libraries and the Academy, 2003
- Science or Snake Oil? Teaching Critical Evaluation of “Research” Reports on the InternetTeaching of Psychology, 2002
- Perceptions of Internet Information CredibilityJournalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 2000
- On the Web, plagiarism matters more than copyright piracyEthics and Information Technology, 1999
- Brave New World? The Challenge of Technology to Time‐Honored Pedagogies and Traditional StructuresNew Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1998
- Listening to Mozart enhances spatial-temporal reasoning: towards a neurophysiological basisNeuroscience Letters, 1995