Comparison of left ventricular lead placement via the coronary venous approach versus lateral thoracotomy in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy
- 1 July 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in The American Journal of Cardiology
- Vol. 94 (1), 59-63
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.03.031
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Is the Left Ventricular Lateral Wall the Best Lead Implantation Site for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy?Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 2003
- Implantation Techniques and Chronic Lead Parameters of Biventricular Pacing Dual‐Chamber DefibrillatorsJournal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 2002
- Left Heart Pacing—Experience with Several Types of Coronary Vein LeadsJournal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2002
- Effects of Multisite Biventricular Pacing in Patients with Heart Failure and Intraventricular Conduction DelayNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- Transvenous left ventricular lead implantation with the EASYTRAK lead system: the European experienceThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2000
- Effect of Pacing Chamber and Atrioventricular Delay on Acute Systolic Function of Paced Patients With Congestive Heart FailureCirculation, 1999
- Improved Left Ventricular Mechanics From Acute VDD Pacing in Patients With Dilated Cardiomyopathy and Ventricular Conduction DelayCirculation, 1999
- Acute hemodynamic effects of biventricular DDD pacing in patients with end-stage heart failureJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1998
- Permanent Left Ventricular Pacing With Transvenous Leads Inserted Into The Coronary VeinsPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1998
- Evaluation of Different Ventricular Pacing Sites in Patients With Severe Heart FailureCirculation, 1997