Evaluation of the potential for virus dispersal during hand drying: a comparison of three methods
Open Access
- 20 January 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of Applied Microbiology
- Vol. 120 (2), 478-486
- https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.13014
Abstract
To use a MS2 bacteriophage model to compare three hand-drying methods, paper towels (PT), a warm air dryer (WAD) and a jet air dryer (JAD), for their potential to disperse viruses and contaminate the immediate environment during use. Participants washed their gloved hands with a suspension of MS2 bacteriophage and hands were dried with one of the three hand-drying devices. The quantity of MS2 present in the areas around each device was determined using a plaque assay. Samples were collected from plates containing the indicator strain, placed at varying heights and distances and also from the air. Over a height range of 0·15-1·65 m, the JAD dispersed an average of >60 and >1300-fold more plaque-forming units (PFU) compared to the WAD and PT (P < 0·0001), respectively. The JAD dispersed an average of >20 and >190-fold more PFU in total compared to WAD and PT at all distances tested up to 3 m (P < 0·01) respectively. Air samples collected around each device 15 min after use indicated that the JAD dispersed an average of >50 and >100-fold more PFU compared to the WAD and PT (P < 0·001), respectively. Use of the JAD lead to significantly greater and further dispersal of MS2 bacteriophage from artificially contaminated hands when compared to the WAD and PT. The choice of hand-drying device should be considered carefully in areas where infection prevention concerns are paramount, such as healthcare settings and the food industry.Funding Information
- University of Westminster
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Hygienic Efficacy of Different Hand-Drying Methods: A Review of the EvidenceMayo Clinic Proceedings, 2012
- Evaluation of the national Cleanyourhands campaign to reduce Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia and Clostridium difficile infection in hospitals in England and Wales by improved hand hygiene: four year, prospective, ecological, interrupted time series studyBMJ, 2012
- Comparative evaluation of the hygienic efficacy of an ultra-rapid hand dryer vs conventional warm air hand dryersJournal of Applied Microbiology, 2010
- Norwalk Virus Shedding after Experimental Human InfectionEmerging Infectious Diseases, 2008
- The effectiveness of hand hygiene procedures in reducing the risks of infections in home and community settings including handwashing and alcohol-based hand sanitizersAmerican Journal of Infection Control, 2007
- Comparative efficacy of hand hygiene agents in the reduction of bacteria and virusesAmerican Journal of Infection Control, 2005
- Epidemiologic Background of Hand Hygiene and Evaluation of the Most Important Agents for Scrubs and RubsClinical Microbiology Reviews, 2004
- How Many Nosocomial Infections are Associated with Cross-Transmission? A Prospective Cohort Study in A Surgical Intensive Care UnitInfection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 2002
- Improving Compliance With Hand Hygiene in HospitalsInfection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 2000
- Hot air electric hand driers compared with paper towels for potential spread of airborne bacteriaJournal of Hospital Infection, 1987