Hidden Complexities in Assessment of Glycemic Outcomes
Open Access
- 9 July 2010
- journal article
- Published by American Diabetes Association in Diabetes Care
- Vol. 33 (10), 2133-2139
- https://doi.org/10.2337/dc09-1665
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate facility rankings in achieving <7% A1C levels based on the complexity of glycemic treatment regimens using threshold and continuous measures. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective administrative data analysis of Veterans Health Administration Medical Centers in 2003–2004. Eligible patients were identified using National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) measure specifications. A complex glycemic regimen (CGR) was defined as receipt of insulin or three oral agents. Facilities were ranked using five ordinal categories based up both z score distribution and statistical significance (P < 0.05). Rankings using the NCQA definition were compared with a subset receiving CGRs using both a <7% threshold and a continuous measure awarding proportional credit for values between 7.9 and <7.0%. Ranking correlation was assessed using the Spearman correlation coefficient. RESULTS: A total of 203,302 patients (mean age 55.2 years) were identified from 127 facilities (range 480–5,411, mean 1,601); 26.7% (17.9–35.2%) were receiving CGRs, including 22.0% receiving insulin. Mean A1C and percent achieving A1C <7% were 7.48 and 48% overall and 8.32 and 24.8% for those receiving CGRs using the threshold measure; proportion achieved was 60.1 and 37.2%, respectively, using the continuous measure. Rank correlation between the overall and CGR subset was 0.61; 8 of 24 of the highest or lowest ranked facilities changed to nonsignificance status; an additional five sites changed rankings. CONCLUSIONS: Facility rankings in achieving the NCQA <7% measure as specified differ markedly from rankings using the CGR subset. Measurement for public reporting or payment should stratify rankings by CGR. A continuous measure may better align incentives with treatment intensity.This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- The association between symptomatic, severe hypoglycaemia and mortality in type 2 diabetes: retrospective epidemiological analysis of the ACCORD studyBMJ, 2010
- Mitigating Case Mix Factors by Choice of Glycemic Control Performance Measure ThresholdDiabetes Care, 2008
- Analytic Bias Among Certified Methods for the Measurement of Hemoglobin A1cAmerican Journal of Clinical Pathology, 2008
- Impact of Self-Reported Patient Characteristics Upon Assessment of Glycemic Control in the Veterans Health AdministrationDiabetes Care, 2007
- Advancing Evidence-Based Care For Diabetes: Lessons From The Veterans Health AdministrationHealth Affairs, 2007
- Comparison of the Glycemic Effects of Rosiglitazone and Pioglitazone in Triple Oral Therapy in Type 2 DiabetesDiabetes Care, 2006
- Comparison of Weighted Performance Measurement and Dichotomous Thresholds for Glycemic Control in the Veterans Health AdministrationDiabetes Care, 2006
- Seasonal Patterns in Monthly Hemoglobin A1c ValuesAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2005
- Who Has Diabetes? Best Estimates of Diabetes Prevalence in the Department of Veterans Affairs Based on Computerized Patient DataDiabetes Care, 2004
- Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33)The Lancet, 1998