A Campus-Wide Investigation of Clicker Implementation: The Status of Peer Discussion in STEM Classes
Open Access
- 1 March 2016
- journal article
- Published by American Society for Cell Biology (ASCB) in CBE—Life Sciences Education
- Vol. 15 (1), ar6
- https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.15-10-0224
Abstract
At the University of Maine, middle and high school teachers observed more than 250 university science, technology, engineering, and mathematics classes and collected information on the nature of instruction, including how clickers were being used. Comparisons of classes taught with (n = 80) and without (n = 184) clickers show that, while instructional behaviors differ, the use of clickers alone does not significantly impact the time instructors spend lecturing. One possible explanation stems from the observation of three distinct modes of clicker use: peer discussion, in which students had the opportunity to talk with one another during clicker questions; individual thinking, in which no peer discussion was observed; and alternative collaboration, in which students had time for discussion, but it was not paired with clicker questions. Investigation of these modes revealed differences in the range of behaviors, the amount of time instructors lecture, and how challenging the clicker questions were to answer. Because instructors can vary their instructional style from one clicker question to the next, we also explored differences in how individual instructors incorporated peer discussion during clicker questions. These findings provide new insights into the range of clicker implementation at a campus-wide level and how such findings can be used to inform targeted professional development for faculty.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Classroom Observation Protocol for Undergraduate STEM (COPUS): A New Instrument to Characterize University STEM Classroom PracticesCBE—Life Sciences Education, 2013
- Facilitating change in undergraduate STEM instructional practices: An analytic review of the literatureJournal of Research in Science Teaching, 2011
- The Benefits of Using Clickers in Small-Enrollment Seminar-Style Biology CoursesCBE—Life Sciences Education, 2011
- The construction of different classroom norms during Peer Instruction: Students perceive differencesPhysical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 2010
- Not all interactive engagement is the same: Variations in physics professors’ implementation ofPeer InstructionPhysical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 2009
- Why Peer Discussion Improves Student Performance on In-Class Concept QuestionsScience, 2009
- Barriers to the use of research-based instructional strategies: The influence of both individual and situational characteristicsPhysical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 2007
- Clickers in the Large Classroom: Current Research and Best-Practice TipsCBE—Life Sciences Education, 2007
- Teaching and learning in the interactive classroomAdvances in Physiology Education, 2006
- Using students' assessments to improve instructors' quality of teachingJournal of Further and Higher Education, 2006