Differences in citation frequency of clinical and basic science papers in cardiovascular research
Open Access
- 13 May 2011
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing
- Vol. 49 (6), 613-621
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-011-0783-6
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Bibliometric data in clinical cardiology revisited. The case of 37 Dutch professorsNetherlands Heart Journal, 2011
- How fractional counting of citations affects the impact factor: Normalization in terms of differences in citation potentials among fields of scienceJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2010
- Normalization at the field level: Fractional counting of citationsJournal of Informetrics, 2010
- Towards a new crown indicator: Some theoretical considerationsJournal of Informetrics, 2010
- The danger of pseudoscience in InformetricsJournal of Informetrics, 2010
- Scopus's source normalized impact per paper (SNIP) versus a journal impact factor based on fractional counting of citationsJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2010
- Biomedical engineering and bibliometric indices for scientific qualityMedical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 2009
- A proposal for calculating weighted citations based on author rankEMBO Reports, 2009
- Expert panels evaluating research: decision-making and sources of biasResearch Evaluation, 2004
- Chance, concurrence, and clustering. Analysis of reviewers' recommendations on 1,000 submissions to the Journal of Clinical Investigation.JCI Insight, 1994