The Trauma Quality Improvement Program: Pilot Study and Initial Demonstration of Feasibility
- 1 February 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
- Vol. 68 (2), 253-262
- https://doi.org/10.1097/ta.0b013e3181cfc8e6
Abstract
The American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma has created a “Trauma Quality Improvement Program” (TQIP) that uses the existing infrastructure of Committee on Trauma programs. As the first step toward full implementation of TQIP, a pilot study was conducted in 23 American College of Surgeons verified or state designated Level I and II trauma centers. This study details the feasibility and acceptance of TQIP among the participating centers. Data from the National Trauma Data Bank for patients admitted to pilot study hospitals during 2007 were used (15,801 patients). A multivariable logistic regression model was developed to estimate risk-adjusted mortality in aggregate and on three prespecified subgroups (1: blunt multisystem, 2: penetrating truncal, and 3: blunt single-system injury). Benchmark reports were developed with each center's risk adjusted mortality (expressed as an observed-to-expected [O/E] mortality ratio and 90% confidence interval [CI]) and crude complication rates available for comparison. Reports were deidentified with only the recipient having access to their performance relative to their peers. Feedback from individual centers regarding the utility of the reports was collected by survey. Overall crude mortality was 7.7% and in cohorts 1 to 3 was 16.4%, 12.4%, and 5.1%, respectively. In the aggregate risk-adjusted analysis, three trauma centers were low outliers (O/E and 90% CI 1) with the remaining 18 centers demonstrating average mortality. Challenges identified were in benchmarking mortality after penetrating injury due to small sample size and in the limited capture of complications. Ninety-two percent of survey respondents found the report clear and understandable, and 90% thought that the report was useful. Sixty-three percent of respondents will be taking action based on the report. Using the National Trauma Data Bank infrastructure to provide risk-adjusted benchmarking of trauma center mortality is feasible and perceived as useful. There are differences in O/E ratios across similarly verified or designated centers. Substantial work is required to allow for morbidity benchmarking.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Quality Improvement Is LocalJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 2009
- Significant Variations in Mortality Occur at Similarly Designated Trauma CentersPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,2009
- Successful Implementation of the Department of Veterans Affairs’ National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in the Private Sector: The Patient Safety in Surgery StudyAnnals of Surgery, 2008
- Trauma Quality Improvement Using Risk-Adjusted OutcomesThe Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 2008
- Association of a Continuous Quality Improvement Initiative With Practice and Outcome Variations of Contemporary Percutaneous Coronary InterventionsCirculation, 2006
- The NSQIP: A new frontier in surgerySurgery, 2005
- The Comparative Assessment and Improvement of Quality of Surgical Care in the Department of Veterans AffairsArchives of Surgery, 2002
- A Regional Prospective Study of In-Hospital Mortality Associated With Coronary Artery Bypass GraftingPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1991
- The Major Trauma Outcome StudyJournal Of Trauma-Injury Infection and Critical Care, 1990
- SIMPLE METHOD TO CALCULATE THE CONFIDENCE INTERVAL OF A STANDARDIZED MORTALITY RATIO (SMR)American Journal of Epidemiology, 1990